Jefferson Lerma

One point made in the defence of Lerma was if there was evidence of a bite mark, how come there are no pictures?

Also Lerma says that he wears a mouth guard, his expert says that he has an "open bite" makes it almost impossible to actually bite someone while wearing a mouth guard
 
omg read the report. It really does come down to he said, he said....No video evidence, no photographic evidence. Experts from each side disagreeing with each other...
 
section 38: "The video recordings are inconclusive, they are consistent of a bite but not conclusive of one. The issue of whether Lerma bit Windass must therefore be resolved by an analysis of the factual evidence"....err wut?

next section outlines the "facts" starting with "Mr Windass believed that he was bitten"

I believe I am a millionaire....does this make it a fact?
 
They took six months to decide? Do they want a job on the AFCB board? This is just silly. But sadly not surprising haha
 
What a farce. I think it’s time someone sued the FA for these ridiculous findings. I remember thinking Mings should’ve done the same when the FA reached the impossible conclusion that he had deliberately stamped on Ibrahimovic’s head.
 

;