An analysis of today

Waz afcb

Fans' Favourite
Not really in the mood to write a report as such today, but thought that I would like to dissect the performance and try to reason as to why it didn’t quite go our way today. So here you go:
Lack of experience/nous:
I’ll start off with an obvious one. Our younger players are clearly immensely talented and have already shown in a short space of time that they are all good enough to make an impact at this level, I don’t think that anybody can debate that. However the reality is that if you are playing with a side who has an average age of under 23 game after game then sooner or later this lack of experience is going to catch up with you. This is in no way a criticism of the younger lads, far from it. I think it’s unrealistic to expect such a young side to be able to maintain the levels we have been every single week. Blackpool were a poor side, after we went 2-0 up I believe the players downed tools to an extent (subconsciously and not intentionally) and thought it would be a walk in the park. We would have won comfortably today if there were one or two senior heads/leaders in the team who would have been able to keep the younger lads grounded and to help them to stand firm when the momentum of the game began to change. I am one hundred percent certain that we win that game if Gary Cahill is playing. Again this is not a criticism, a lot of these lads aren’t even into double figures for league games yet, there were always going to be moments where lack of nous would prove costly.

A tactical reliance on Kilkenny:
This worried me more than the first point. A lack of experience can be addressed but after closely watching our tactical set up in these opening weeks it has become clear to me that there is a glaring weakness; stop Kilkenny from getting the ball and you stop us from playing. Near enough everything we do comes through him, in the opening exchanges today we were able to get him on the ball and we reaped the rewards. At around the 20-25 minute mark Blackpool started to deploy a clear strategy to stop Kilkenny receiving the ball at all costs, very diligently closing down the passing corridors been himself and the back four. As a result he was starved of the ball and the back four had no avenue to progress the ball up the pitch, Billing and Marcondes were both playing high up the pitch and as a result we pretty much had a front five who we were unable to get the ball to. Our only chances from this point onwards came when we went more direct, but this tactic was not deployed nearly enough and as a result we saw a lot of passing around the back ie possession without substance. For me I’m not sure how viable this formation is long term given it’s over reliance on one player.

Mepham at right back:
I’m not going to criticise Mepham’s individual performance because he is absolutely not a right back in any way shape or form, but it was blatantly obvious that the team suffered today for not having a natural right back/any attacking threat from the right back position. Parker’s philosophy is centred around creating overloads/forming passing triangles down the flanks when in the final third. That lack of attacking underlapping threat from that side severely stunted our ability to create down the right flank. There was more than one occasion when Brooks had to come infield into a congested area due to the fact he had no underlapping runner from deep, this more often than not resulted in us turning over possession and limited our ability to build a sustained period of pressure. Our threat down the right was non existent in the second half.

Kelly’s relaxed nature on the ball:
Another key contributing factor to the inability to hold out. Lost count of the number of times he took too long on the ball/gifted possession to Blackpool. He constantly put us under pressure through his inability to recognise when he was under pressure. If he had made smarter decisions in the ball today, then I believe that we win. We needed our captain to be smart and to make the correct decisions on the pitch today, unfortunately he was unable to deliver this. The last thing you want to do when 2-0 up at home against an underdog is give them a sniff that there might be something in this for them, every time he dallied on the ball/lost possession you could see that this just spurred Blackpool on more and more and have them belief that there was something in the game for them.
 
Not really in the mood to write a report as such today, but thought that I would like to dissect the performance and try to reason as to why it didn’t quite go our way today. So here you go:
Lack of experience/nous:
I’ll start off with an obvious one. Our younger players are clearly immensely talented and have already shown in a short space of time that they are all good enough to make an impact at this level, I don’t think that anybody can debate that. However the reality is that if you are playing with a side who has an average age of under 23 game after game then sooner or later this lack of experience is going to catch up with you. This is in no way a criticism of the younger lads, far from it. I think it’s unrealistic to expect such a young side to be able to maintain the levels we have been every single week. Blackpool were a poor side, after we went 2-0 up I believe the players downed tools to an extent (subconsciously and not intentionally) and thought it would be a walk in the park. We would have won comfortably today if there were one or two senior heads/leaders in the team who would have been able to keep the younger lads grounded and to help them to stand firm when the momentum of the game began to change. I am one hundred percent certain that we win that game if Gary Cahill is playing. Again this is not a criticism, a lot of these lads aren’t even into double figures for league games yet, there were always going to be moments where lack of nous would prove costly.

A tactical reliance on Kilkenny:
This worried me more than the first point. A lack of experience can be addressed but after closely watching our tactical set up in these opening weeks it has become clear to me that there is a glaring weakness; stop Kilkenny from getting the ball and you stop us from playing. Near enough everything we do comes through him, in the opening exchanges today we were able to get him on the ball and we reaped the rewards. At around the 20-25 minute mark Blackpool started to deploy a clear strategy to stop Kilkenny receiving the ball at all costs, very diligently closing down the passing corridors been himself and the back four. As a result he was starved of the ball and the back four had no avenue to progress the ball up the pitch, Billing and Marcondes were both playing high up the pitch and as a result we pretty much had a front five who we were unable to get the ball to. Our only chances from this point onwards came when we went more direct, but this tactic was not deployed nearly enough and as a result we saw a lot of passing around the back ie possession without substance. For me I’m not sure how viable this formation is long term given it’s over reliance on one player.

Mepham at right back:
I’m not going to criticise Mepham’s individual performance because he is absolutely not a right back in any way shape or form, but it was blatantly obvious that the team suffered today for not having a natural right back/any attacking threat from the right back position. Parker’s philosophy is centred around creating overloads/forming passing triangles down the flanks when in the final third. That lack of attacking underlapping threat from that side severely stunted our ability to create down the right flank. There was more than one occasion when Brooks had to come infield into a congested area due to the fact he had no underlapping runner from deep, this more often than not resulted in us turning over possession and limited our ability to build a sustained period of pressure. Our threat down the right was non existent in the second half.

Kelly’s relaxed nature on the ball:
Another key contributing factor to the inability to hold out. Lost count of the number of times he took too long on the ball/gifted possession to Blackpool. He constantly put us under pressure through his inability to recognise when he was under pressure. If he had made smarter decisions in the ball today, then I believe that we win. We needed our captain to be smart and to make the correct decisions on the pitch today, unfortunately he was unable to deliver this. The last thing you want to do when 2-0 up at home against an underdog is give them a sniff that there might be something in this for them, every time he dallied on the ball/lost possession you could see that this just spurred Blackpool on more and more and have them belief that there was something in the game for them.
I noticed on TV that it seemed our younger players were being deliberately targeted by Blackpool's players trying to put them off their game.
There were several times it showed our players on the ground thinking 'what the eff needs to happen before thhay get a card's.
 
I noticed on TV that it seemed our younger players were being deliberately targeted by Blackpool's players trying to put them off their game.
There were several times it showed our players on the ground thinking 'what the eff needs to happen before thhay get a card's.
They got their first yellow in the 8th minute, the much talked about Luke Garbutt. The referee did dish the yellow's out, it seemed like he wouldn't give a red though.
 
They got their first yellow in the 8th minute, the much talked about Luke Garbutt. The referee did dish the yellow's out, it seemed like he wouldn't give a red though.
The number of counter attack preventing professional fouls the ref refused to book was baffling. Just encouraged Blackpool to keep doing it, obviously. It's part of the game, I get it, you take the booking for the team. Except the bookings never came...
 
One of the major problems today...was that a football club of latterly lesser levels and achievements rocked up at DC...with as much intent on putting the pigs bladder in the onion bag as did our brave young combateers.....OK said lesser beings capitulated in the early confrontation...but they tightened their braces...and Bobby Balled us good and proper int 2nd arf !
They fookin Rocked our Tommie's..

Its a common weakness and over the last two seasons...for our ' PL honeyed ' and 'ageing and maturing' JCL's to become less sugared and more acid in their respect of any opposition.
Any slide down, now, in this Div, will see the biggest Fire Drill since Pudding Lane !
 
Last edited:
Not really in the mood to write a report as such today, but thought that I would like to dissect the performance and try to reason as to why it didn’t quite go our way today. So here you go:
Lack of experience/nous:
I’ll start off with an obvious one. Our younger players are clearly immensely talented and have already shown in a short space of time that they are all good enough to make an impact at this level, I don’t think that anybody can debate that. However the reality is that if you are playing with a side who has an average age of under 23 game after game then sooner or later this lack of experience is going to catch up with you. This is in no way a criticism of the younger lads, far from it. I think it’s unrealistic to expect such a young side to be able to maintain the levels we have been every single week. Blackpool were a poor side, after we went 2-0 up I believe the players downed tools to an extent (subconsciously and not intentionally) and thought it would be a walk in the park. We would have won comfortably today if there were one or two senior heads/leaders in the team who would have been able to keep the younger lads grounded and to help them to stand firm when the momentum of the game began to change. I am one hundred percent certain that we win that game if Gary Cahill is playing. Again this is not a criticism, a lot of these lads aren’t even into double figures for league games yet, there were always going to be moments where lack of nous would prove costly.

A tactical reliance on Kilkenny:
This worried me more than the first point. A lack of experience can be addressed but after closely watching our tactical set up in these opening weeks it has become clear to me that there is a glaring weakness; stop Kilkenny from getting the ball and you stop us from playing. Near enough everything we do comes through him, in the opening exchanges today we were able to get him on the ball and we reaped the rewards. At around the 20-25 minute mark Blackpool started to deploy a clear strategy to stop Kilkenny receiving the ball at all costs, very diligently closing down the passing corridors been himself and the back four. As a result he was starved of the ball and the back four had no avenue to progress the ball up the pitch, Billing and Marcondes were both playing high up the pitch and as a result we pretty much had a front five who we were unable to get the ball to. Our only chances from this point onwards came when we went more direct, but this tactic was not deployed nearly enough and as a result we saw a lot of passing around the back ie possession without substance. For me I’m not sure how viable this formation is long term given it’s over reliance on one player.

Mepham at right back:
I’m not going to criticise Mepham’s individual performance because he is absolutely not a right back in any way shape or form, but it was blatantly obvious that the team suffered today for not having a natural right back/any attacking threat from the right back position. Parker’s philosophy is centred around creating overloads/forming passing triangles down the flanks when in the final third. That lack of attacking underlapping threat from that side severely stunted our ability to create down the right flank. There was more than one occasion when Brooks had to come infield into a congested area due to the fact he had no underlapping runner from deep, this more often than not resulted in us turning over possession and limited our ability to build a sustained period of pressure. Our threat down the right was non existent in the second half.

Kelly’s relaxed nature on the ball:
Another key contributing factor to the inability to hold out. Lost count of the number of times he took too long on the ball/gifted possession to Blackpool. He constantly put us under pressure through his inability to recognise when he was under pressure. If he had made smarter decisions in the ball today, then I believe that we win. We needed our captain to be smart and to make the correct decisions on the pitch today, unfortunately he was unable to deliver this. The last thing you want to do when 2-0 up at home against an underdog is give them a sniff that there might be something in this for them, every time he dallied on the ball/lost possession you could see that this just spurred Blackpool on more and more and have them belief that there was something in the game for them.
What a load of carp, we played players out of position because we had no others, hadn't you noticed we have injuries? State the painfully obvious without actually recognising that for example all our right backs are injured, who would you have played there?
Give me strength
 
What a load of carp, we played players out of position because we had no others, hadn't you noticed we have injuries? State the painfully obvious without actually recognising that for example all our right backs are injured, who would you have played there?
Give me strength
I think Mepham must have been injured when he went off, because he had surprisingly acquitted himself well up to that point.
 
What a load of carp, we played players out of position because we had no others, hadn't you noticed we have injuries? State the painfully obvious without actually recognising that for example all our right backs are injured, who would you have played there?
Give me strength
Could be wrong as I only skim read, but I don’t think he suggested that we should have played someone else at right back, he was suggesting that not having a natural right back on the pitch hindered us…..and he’s not wrong. Nothing anyone can do about it given current injuries, but it hindered us nonetheless.
 
Could be wrong as I only skim read, but I don’t think he suggested that we should have played someone else at right back, he was suggesting that not having a natural right back on the pitch hindered us…..and he’s not wrong. Nothing anyone can do about it given current injuries, but it hindered us nonetheless.
Yes but it's like saying if we had Messi and Ronaldo in the team we would probably would have won, we can only put out the players that are fit
 
What a load of carp, we played players out of position because we had no others, hadn't you noticed we have injuries? State the painfully obvious without actually recognising that for example all our right backs are injured, who would you have played there?
Give me strength
.
You need strength?...
We had NO f√cking . f√cking others ? ....There are millions of players in the Grass Roots of English Football gagging for it !
 
Had a gut feeling about this one. What really gets to me though is our constant injury crisis. As much as I rate Junior, how long will he be out now? We need our old stalwarts back PDQ. Already two relegated sides are sitting top two. I know it's very early days but it's consistency that gains promotion. I took the draw against West Brom as they are going to prove themselves this season. We do seem lightweight and lacking in depth when the chips are down. I know that most teams generally have an injury crisis at some point during the season, let's hope this is ours. On wards and upwards, we move on to the next one.
UTCIAD
 
The players certainly didn't down tools from where I was sitting.

As you rightly point out in point 2, Blackpool worked us out after 25 mins and identified that they needed to press Rossi and Kilkenny hard to make them rush.

They also nullified Anthony after the break and pushed much more of their attacks down the flanks.

Sometimes you do need to give the opposition some credit.
 
I don't think we have Millions of players registered to play. But, I'm happy to be corrected.
It ain't my fault the strategy of Football in this land is the way it is..MONEY fuelled SHITE. !. Come on you know this...the football public has long been conned by the marketing Bollux that abounds across once simple and basic 'Sport'. ..unless of course you have High tea with ' Agents'....or pissy- assed 'Soccer' journalists...cuz that's where its going matey..American style 'Football'.
You can laugh at my rants...now....but if you love your Football ..the original real. Football...Brace !..more sh*t is coming over the Atlantic... with Baseball, Gridiron ' Football'' and Basketball veneers !
I'm a bit 'sheets' t'windward but i know wha im on about..oh feckin Yes !
 
Last edited:

;