Looks like that was from the TV camera behind and to the left of the goal. No contact at all from that.
Looks like that was from the TV camera behind and to the left of the goal. No contact at all from that.
In some eyes, but I wouldn't be impressed if one of our players had got a second for that. I think Christie has gotten away with worse a few times this season, when he could have gone... Chelsea way I think for one.Wild and reckless
I haven't seen any contact but I presume it was one of those where he bumps his leg or something which affects his stride, causing him to kick his own foot on the next stride.Thats after the contact. Hence why it doesnt show it...
I haven't seen any contact but I presume it was one of those where he bumps his leg or something which affects his stride, causing him to kick his own foot on the next stride.
In which case, the contact would have been a bit earlier.
Get that clip but two or three steps earlier. There's clearly contact, nothing intentional and far less contact that was waved on by the ref through the match.
So MOM - Man Of Moment.Sometimes when someone has an extraordinary performance they deserve the accolades that come with it.
Don't need to prove intent.He was looking at the ball, there was no intent to kick Brooks.
Did the Gakpo penalty focus on the question of Cook contact, or did they take into account the earlier foul in the build-up as well? Anything that does the former and doesn't include the latter (i.e. everything I've seen in the media) is lacking so far as I'm concerned.Interestingly on ref watch, they covered the penalty, our goal, the penalty shout for us and MacAlister’s potential second yellow card and they all, including Stephen Warnock who played for Liverpool for 5 years, all agreed with every decision the ref made.
So that’s settled then.
Did the Gakpo penalty focus on the question of Cook contact, or did they take into account the earlier foul in the build-up as well? Anything that does the former and doesn't include the latter (i.e. everything I've seen in the media) is lacking so far as I'm concerned.
Did the Gakpo penalty focus on the question of Cook contact, or did they take into account the earlier foul in the build-up as well? Anything that does the former and doesn't include the latter (i.e. everything I've seen in the media) is lacking so far as I'm concerned.
All those 50/50 decisions and they see each one going the way of Liverpool. Such a coincidence!
I saw a clip of it yesterday (can't remember where) and the contact was clear and changed gakpos foot position, before that I was sure the call was wrongFrom the videos I have seen including slow motion I wouldn’t say it was a clear cut penalty.
But the panel which included Gallagher must have seen a different view or angle to say Cook clipped him.
It will be one of those talked about moments, but with Salah scoring the second it made certain even if that penalty hadn’t been given.
Another day Semenyo’s shot would have gone in as would the shot from Tavernier, it just wasn’t meant to be our day.
Still don't care what any says. That is handball by Trent all day long.All the najor decisions were unfortunately correct, except maybe MacAllister 2nd yellow which you'd still more than often see people get away with. The issue was all the other niggly incidents and 50/50 decisions which went Liverpool's way. No Sky or MOTD highlights will ever cover that.