Man City...

Telly123 said:
I assumed perhaps you followed us and Millwall, now I'm leaning towards us and Liverpool or Man U :D.

The only people I've come across with such strong view towards breaking the clearly anti competition rules and their rightful place is p1ssed off United fans ;)

Can't provide what you're request... heres another angle, looking at the last decade or so of winners and runners up. Theres an obvious black swan event in there - interestingly, they provided another black swan event a few years later, by achieving something the established clubs havent... Relegation.

So looking at runners up, who would have more titles to their name if City didnt win the pl?

Chelsea on the periphery there of breaking the big club stranglehood - now how did they suddenly start winning leagues in the 2000's - before FFP was allowed to turn into the most glaringly artificial, anti-competition rules in a professional sport.

Now's the time to change it man, not to double down on bullshit rules - pl are almost on the ropes here, and for the greater good of the sport, genuine football fans should be on city side, and hope they knock the pl rules the f out.

Unless you're a United fan of course, and/or perhaps....


View attachment 22728


View attachment 22727
Click to expand...
I’m can’t really make out what your point is to be honest and I don’t support Millwall .
I only bought up Liverpool and Manchester United in response to the Cornish fantasist .
If you think it’s only Manu fans that are livid about this I think you’re mistaken …. Judging by your last sentence I think you’re suggesting we support ManC …well fcuk that and we can obviously see who your second team is .
 
Happy Harbinger said:
That's all bullshit ..City were as big as Utd before the Munich Air Crash...and easily as big as Liverpool and Chelsea back the through the history of the English league...they hit a bad patch in the 80's but slowly came back.
Liverpool and Chelsea have been in the lower league..so have Manu !
Click to expand...
State some facts as to how ManC are historically as big as Manu and Liverpool .
 
In Manchester United's quest to become bigger than Real Madrid they had to 'get rid' of Manchester City.

THEY are somehow behind this witch hunt.
It will come out in the wash one day.
 
wallmth said:
State some facts as to how ManC are historically as big as Manu and Liverpool .
Click to expand...
Pre-war and 1950's league tables are one such way !
Record English attendance..84,500 in 1934. at Maine Road.
Tell me something . do you actually like the c√nts being bigger than Boscombe...and do you get off on that f√cking disputed hand- ball / penalty in the 1957 Quarter Final.

Red Manc Sh*t
 
Happy Harbinger said:
In Manchester United's quest to become bigger than Real Madrid they had to 'get rid' of Manchester City.

THEY are somehow behind this witch hunt.
It will come out in the wash one day.
Click to expand...
Oh it’s a fcuking witch hunt now …you and Telly should get a room peruse some old ManC massive programs for the old wankbank .
 
wallmth said:
Oh it’s a fcuking witch hunt now …you and Telly should get a room peruse some old ManC massive programs for the old wankbank .
Click to expand...
Christ on a Surfboard .... i've got you well wound tonight Wallmth !
Nothing i'm ever going to say will get you off my case will it...but hey that's Internet Life for you !

A few pints in the pub or Supporters Club in the old days would probably have secured a more amicable ambience !
 
Happy Harbinger said:
Tell me something . do you actually like the c√nts being bigger than Boscombe...and do you get off on that f√cking disputed hand- ball / penalty in the 1957 Quarter Final.

Red Manc Sh*t
Click to expand...
I’m probably a little more upset about the cheating c*nts in the blue side of Manchester beating us a few weeks ago and every time we go to that fcukin stadium . I love playing Manu whatever your imaginary corruption is it’s not working for them is it .
You need to make your mind up mush . Are city the biggest club in England taking their correct place at the table or the plucky underdogs being victimize by their bullying Red big brother?
 
Last edited:
Happy Harbinger said:
Christ on a Surfboard .... i've got you well wound tonight Wallmth !
Nothing i'm ever going to say will get you off my case will it...but hey that's Internet Life for you !

A few pints in the pub or Supporters Club in the old days would probably have secured a more amicable ambience !
Click to expand...
wound up ?? In your dreams fantasy boy .
 
wallmth said:
I’m probably a little more upset about the cheating c*nts in the blue side of Manchester beating us a few weeks ago and every time we go to that fcukin stadium . I love playing Manu whatever your imaginary corruption is it’s not working for them is it .
You need to make your mind up mush . Are city the biggest club in England taking their correct place at the table or the plucky underdogs being victimize by their bullying Red big brother?
Click to expand...
I don't recognise 'Big'.

I'm into Results.
 
It will be interesting to see how MC players cope with this....they are currently top with a 100% record....and the breaches of rules don't cover this period....if they are not deducted points this season will they carry on as normal out of sheer buggerance or capitulate under the media pressure ?..after all in fairness it's not actually involving them....only the 'Suitjobs'.
Assuming now..that the Appeal will take it on another long journey.
 
Happy Harbinger said:
Pre-war and 1950's league tables are one such way !
Record English attendance..84,500 in 1934. at Maine Road.
Tell me something . do you actually like the c√nts being bigger than Boscombe...and do you get off on that f√cking disputed hand- ball / penalty in the 1957 Quarter Final.

Red Manc Sh*t
Click to expand...
To be fair city had a home crowd of just under 14.000 against Newcastle 3 weeks after the stoke game
 
How many at that Stoke match were Stoke fans?

It was almost 100 years ago, things have changed.

Non-league trophies are easier and cheaper to buy than full-time professional ones. Success is much more about money in the non-league than the top leagues : )
 
table said:
How many at that Stoke match were Stoke fans?

It was almost 100 years ago, things have changed.

Non-league trophies are easier and cheaper to buy than full-time professional ones. Success is much more about money in the non-league than the top leagues : )
Click to expand...
So then ...MONEY is the prime mover in ALL leagues ...one big spreadsheet exercise... ...amateur sport is pretty much dead now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

;