Match report vs Rotherham

Waz afcb

Fans' Favourite
To say that this one won’t live long in the memory wouldn’t be an understatement, in fact it’s a minor miracle that I’ve not forgotten it already. Bournemouth lined up with four changes from the side that limped to an uninspiring draw at the weekend, most notable were the inclusions of Phil Bill and the much requested Surridge. The two had linked up well in the cup at Burnley so you could clearly see the logic in Woodgate’s thinking.

As has become the norm, the game started off in a scrappy manner. Both sides spent the opening exchanges taking it in turns to hopefully punt the ball up the field to very little effect. When we did try to play out from the back we were once again unable to break the intense opposition high press. The only out ball was often the two full backs who subsequently had no where to go other than backwards to find a team mate, this led to many hopeful balls knocked down the channels which were continuously gobbled up by Rotherham’s dominant back three. It was obvious that we weren’t going to play through them so if we were to score it was going to be on the counter, and sure enough that’s exactly what happened! Yet another hopeful long ball forward was headed clear by Smith and out to Surridge who had dropped deep into the wide right channel, he drove into space and released the ball to Smith who had bust a hit to arrive on the over lap. Smith took one look up and played a very intelligent cut back which arrived at Billing in the centre of the penalty area, Billing controlled the ball expertly and smashed home an emphatic finish to finally bring life to a drab encounter. It was the one piece of real quality we produced all game and credit must go to Smith who was instrumental in making it happen.

The game then quickly reverted back to type, both sides struggling badly to retain possession and get any kind of foothold in the game. The half finished with Bournemouth incredibly lucky not to concede. A clipped a free kick to the back post inexplicably found four (yes four) Rotherham players totally unmarked around six yards out, the ball was helped almost apologetically across the face of goal and onto an on rushing attacker a couple of yards out with an empty net at his mercy. Just as those watching stared on in an incredulous state of disbelief, our defensive generosity was repaid by attacking impotency that would have made even a man without a single testicle look incredibly fertile, as the Rotherham forward somehow managed to balloon the ball into the north stand from what felt like directly under the cross bar. A massive let off which saw us into the break narrowly ahead. In fairness replays did show that the ball arrived slightly behind the on rushing attacker and at an awkward angle.

Bournemouth came out in the second half a reinvigorated side, zipping the ball around crisply and carving out a number of early openings with forward thinking and incisive football. That was a joke. The second half quickly settled into a familiar pattern with the ball spending the majority of time in the air. In truth the best moments of the half belonged to Rotherham. Firstly a spectacular volley from the edge of the box which looked destined to see the net ripple bought about an even more spectacular save from a fully stretched Begovic, a truly brilliant save that we’ve become accustomed to this season. Then the Rotherham substitute Onyadima was played in on goal on the angle of the penalty area, just as you thought the net was about to bulge the outstretched leg of Kelly arrived to provide enough of a distraction to once again see the ball end up in the stand behind the goal. Another let off. Bournemouth’s only moment of note came when Stanislas drew a smart save at the near post from a well struck twenty yard strike in the dying embers. Our brave warriors managed to see out the game by theatrically throwing themselves to the ground at every opportunity in what was quite frankly the most entertaining period of the game for me (in all the wrong reasons.) And so it was, another scrappy and somewhat fortunate three points on the board to cement claim to that holy grail that is sixth position, with attentions now firmly turned to off the pitch matters and in particular a French man who’s name escapes me...

Player ratings to follow!
 
Begovic- 8 made a few strong claims and two very good saves (one of which would have been offside) MOTM
Smith- 7 relatively busy and produced the one real moment of quality in the game.
Rico- 5 oh dear, we paid 10m for a left back who is only seems capable of punting the ball hopefully down the channel. If I’m being kind he did improve a bit in the second half.
CCV- 7.5 solid as always.
Kelly- 7 relatively solid and dealt with the physical threat well.
L Cook- 4 ineffective, could not get a grip on the game at all.
Lerma- 6 battled well but quality on the ball was often lacking.
Billing- 6 finished the goal very nicely, that aside did not impact the game much at all.
Danjuma- 3 a performance that even Jordon Ibe would be embarrassed of.
Stanislas- 5 starting to impact the game a bit later on but largely anonymous.
Surridge- 5 felt a bit sorry for him. Worked hard but fed off of scraps. Am sure he will receive criticism but not entirely justified in my opinion.
Brooks- 6 actually played some neat passes when he came on, a definite improvement.
 
Begovic- 8 made a few strong claims and two very good saves (one of which would have been offside) MOTM
Smith- 7 relatively busy and produced the one real moment of quality in the game.
Rico- 5 oh dear, we paid 10m for a left back who is only seems capable of punting the ball hopefully down the channel. If I’m being kind he did improve a bit in the second half.
CCV- 7.5 solid as always.
Kelly- 7 relatively solid and dealt with the physical threat well.
L Cook- 4 ineffective, could not get a grip on the game at all.
Lerma- 6 battled well but quality on the ball was often lacking.
Billing- 6 finished the goal very nicely, that aside did not impact the game much at all.
Danjuma- 3 a performance that even Jordon Ibe would be embarrassed of.
Stanislas- 5 starting to impact the game a bit later on but largely anonymous.
Surridge- 5 felt a bit sorry for him. Worked hard but fed off of scraps. Am sure he will receive criticism but not entirely justified in my opinion.
Brooks- 6 actually played some neat passes when he came on, a definite improvement.
Crazy marks.
 
*Pedant Alert*

The chap who missed the sitter just before half time was Wood, a centre back, not a “striker”. The sub who came on and blazed over was Ladapo, who scored both goals against us last time we played them.

There was only one quality attacking moment from us in the whole game. But that was one more than the Forest game.

Begovic was certainly the most entertaining player to watch. Two great saves (one was offside anyway), and a couple of extraordinary punched clearances (one a bit limp-wristed) from near the edge of the penalty area. I was never too confident what he was going to do next.

Jefferson Lerma and Smithie would make a pretty good pairing in the Olympic Synchronised Diving Competition. Jeff in particular tonight doing a great impression of a salmon leaping upstream.

Thanks for the report Waz.
 
*Pedant Alert*

The chap who missed the sitter just before half time was Wood, a centre back, not a “striker”. The sub who came on and blazed over was Ladapo, who scored both goals against us last time we played them.

There was only one quality attacking moment from us in the whole game. But that was one more than the Forest game.

Begovic was certainly the most entertaining player to watch. Two great saves (one was offside anyway), and a couple of extraordinary punched clearances (one a bit limp-wristed) from near the edge of the penalty area. I was never too confident what he was going to do next.

Jefferson Lerma and Smithie would make a pretty good pairing in the Olympic Synchronised Diving Competition. Jeff in particular tonight doing a great impression of a salmon leaping upstream.

Thanks for the report Waz.
That wasn’t a sitter IMO, the ball fell behind his run and he wasn’t able to adjust himself
 
Haha. Ok. The chap who missed the chance where the ball fell behind his run and he wasn’t able to adjust himself, was Wood, a centre back, not a striker. (Sitter for short) !!!!
 
Begovic- 8 made a few strong claims and two very good saves (one of which would have been offside) MOTM
Smith- 7 relatively busy and produced the one real moment of quality in the game.
Rico- 5 oh dear, we paid 10m for a left back who is only seems capable of punting the ball hopefully down the channel. If I’m being kind he did improve a bit in the second half.
CCV- 7.5 solid as always.
Kelly- 7 relatively solid and dealt with the physical threat well.
L Cook- 4 ineffective, could not get a grip on the game at all.
Lerma- 6 battled well but quality on the ball was often lacking.
Billing- 6 finished the goal very nicely, that aside did not impact the game much at all.
Danjuma- 3 a performance that even Jordon Ibe would be embarrassed of.
Stanislas- 5 starting to impact the game a bit later on but largely anonymous.
Surridge- 5 felt a bit sorry for him. Worked hard but fed off of scraps. Am sure he will receive criticism but not entirely justified in my opinion.
Brooks- 6 actually played some neat passes when he came on, a definite improvement.
I think that was a fair description of the game I watched. We don't seem to attack with any pace at all. The odd dribble by Smith but nobody having a real go at the big defenders. They can't turn as quickly as a smaller guy. Surridge had little ball at all. I think Pearson should have been playing from the off he is stronger & plays a better game the LC. I think we need to play smarter against QPR, they will not be that easy on us. But a win is a win even though we were lucky.
 
Last edited:
That wasn’t a sitter IMO, the ball fell behind his run and he wasn’t able to adjust himself
You are right. Just when you need a female commentator to pipe up and say "that was easier to miss" and actually be right in doing so, they are nowhere to be found !
;)
 
We do look like a team that has just been thrown together . The only way to help that cohesion is to allow people to play and build up relationships on the field ie Kelly and CCV. You need to give people a run of games.
I think we are blessed with a lot of individual talent and that no one really knows what are best team is.
 
Thanks for the report.

For me, it was a Tindall performance. We didn't look good but this time we got the result. On another night we wouldn't have. You can't sniff at the three points but you can have legitimate concerns that there are no signs that JW is galvanising the talent in the squad any more than JT managed.

That may be due to issues with the players but that's the manager's job with us right now. Some clubs bring in a new manager when they need to rebuild, some clubs have a good set of players that aren't working together and need someone to forge them into a team. The latter is where we are right now.

He's picked up some points for which I'm grateful but I hope we can find a candidate that knows how to blow up cliques and inspire individuals into forming a group.
 
Thanks for the report.

For me, it was a Tindall performance. We didn't look good but this time we got the result. On another night we wouldn't have. You can't sniff at the three points but you can have legitimate concerns that there are no signs that JW is galvanising the talent in the squad any more than JT managed.

That may be due to issues with the players but that's the manager's job with us right now. Some clubs bring in a new manager when they need to rebuild, some clubs have a good set of players that aren't working together and need someone to forge them into a team. The latter is where we are right now.

He's picked up some points for which I'm grateful but I hope we can find a candidate that knows how to blow up cliques and inspire individuals into forming a group.

This .
 
Thanks for the report.

For me, it was a Tindall performance. We didn't look good but this time we got the result. On another night we wouldn't have. You can't sniff at the three points but you can have legitimate concerns that there are no signs that JW is galvanising the talent in the squad any more than JT managed.

That may be due to issues with the players but that's the manager's job with us right now. Some clubs bring in a new manager when they need to rebuild, some clubs have a good set of players that aren't working together and need someone to forge them into a team. The latter is where we are right now.

He's picked up some points for which I'm grateful but I hope we can find a candidate that knows how to blow up cliques and inspire individuals into forming a group.
I think JW has served / is serving us well in steadying the ship, we look a bit more solid, maybe do the basics slightly better (although far from polished). For that JW certainly warrants a place at the club on the staff and on the training ground. Yes it needs someone to come in as a figure head and pull it all together into a team.
 
Thanks for the report.

For me, it was a Tindall performance. We didn't look good but this time we got the result. On another night we wouldn't have. You can't sniff at the three points but you can have legitimate concerns that there are no signs that JW is galvanising the talent in the squad any more than JT managed.

That may be due to issues with the players but that's the manager's job with us right now. Some clubs bring in a new manager when they need to rebuild, some clubs have a good set of players that aren't working together and need someone to forge them into a team. The latter is where we are right now.

He's picked up some points for which I'm grateful but I hope we can find a candidate that knows how to blow up cliques and inspire individuals into forming a group.
Agree mostly JT performance if JW defensive edge (that got 3 points again).

I keep hearing your final comments from lots of people and the more it's repeated the more it's taken as fact. Help me out, on the one hand we want to develop combinations like left back and left wing, front three, midfield three, right back and right wing, but we also want to blow up cliques. All teams need sub groups and different levels of bonding, where is boundary of healthy and unhealthy for this team.

Is there a documentary or some lengthy evidence of all this disruption in the dressing room? How do we know it's really a valid excuse.

Is it not possible that they are as normal a team as any other in the country, whether that's football or business. There's never perfect harmony. Bet they weren't patting each other on the back in the Brentford dressing room yesterday.

Just because it isn't all working doesn't mean there is some magic bullet to solve it all.

Maybe just like any other team, it has an overload of some qualities which we recognise should make them 'the best squad' but they lack the other qualities we can't see which are equally important. I doubt a new manager will be able to hand those missing traits out, but we hoping they can better compensate for those dificiencies.

Personally, I think the squad has missed not having enough players who read the game and think differently. That's what Wilshere brings. We had too great chances, one against Forest and one last night. On both occasions our player made the obvious run into the box for cross, when holding the run was the option the crosser wanted. Much like their defender over ran their chance last night. Stanislas and Billing made such similar runs last night Stanislas needed to evade the ball.

How often does anyone see that our corners either go beyond far post or get cleared to edge of the 18? A different coach might position an attacker to arrive very late, but that player still has to read what the most likely outcome is and how to vary the movement - who reads the game like that in this squad?

We all want more and can see small changes would bring big results, sadly I can't be sure if they can't see it, can see it but can't get it right, or maybe more worried about something else we can't see. Hopefully their heads are still lifting as they go into the weekend. Symbolical if we can get a result Brentford couldn't.
 
Thanks for the report.

For me, it was a Tindall performance. We didn't look good but this time we got the result. On another night we wouldn't have. You can't sniff at the three points but you can have legitimate concerns that there are no signs that JW is galvanising the talent in the squad any more than JT managed.

That may be due to issues with the players but that's the manager's job with us right now. Some clubs bring in a new manager when they need to rebuild, some clubs have a good set of players that aren't working together and need someone to forge them into a team. The latter is where we are right now.

He's picked up some points for which I'm grateful but I hope we can find a candidate that knows how to blow up cliques and inspire individuals into forming a group.

totally agree .
Biggest difference really was that we got the little bit of luck you need in a game ie them missing an open goal.

teams are always going to have chances and the last few games teams seem to have a few less chances .
I think Pearson playing is a must and protects the back 4 very well.

attacking wise we don’t look threatening . I can’t remember the last time we looked to batter a team pin them in and create hatful of chances.

when you are creating loads of chances and you make a mistake at get back , you know you have a chance of coming back due to you being able to create chances.
If we currently go 1 down you worry where the chances will come from
 

;