I've seen a couple now calling for a Cahill-Cook pairing. Now, I like both and think they're both great players. But physically, they're both aging and not the most competitive in terms in speed, and thus weak to balls in behind. Counters to that tactic would be to keep one of the faster full backs back or to keep a low block instead of the higher line we'd expect of the attacking team many here call for. Would those that call for a Cahill-Cook pairing be willing to take that sacrifice? Or should we just accept said weakness?
Edit: was wrong about a couple, rereading the thread I think only Neil called for that pairing. So I guess the question is just for you?