blandford_cherry
UTC Legend
Will he maintain fitness and be injury free?
He’s an option though, showed his quality in that Swansea game
Will he maintain fitness and be injury free?
He’s an option though, showed his quality in that Swansea game
I'm sure he'll manage a 5 yard pass to Phillips or Travers.....sounds like the perfect Parker full back tbf.From whoscored
Tackling -Very Strong
Concentration -Strong
Weaknesses
Passing -Weak
Has there actually been any news Re his contract...?I had forgotten Brady I assumed he had left.
There we go, I wondered when the next one would beI'm sure he'll manage a 5 yard pass to Phillips or Travers.....sounds like the perfect Parker full back tbf.
Has there actually been any news Re his contract...?
Has there actually been any news Re his contract...?
Bonkers!I don’t think Stacey was that much poorer than Smith . Both are big liabilities
Seems like we are leaning towards signing players on a free rather than just throwing money at other clubs to get the players we’ve identified at all costs.
Personally I’m quite happy to see that.
Bonkers!
No problem with signing players on a free, if they are good enough. Rothwell would be a very good signing, one of the most creative midfielders in the championship last season and just hitting his prime. Fredericks is injury prone, past his peak, will be 30 in September and was third choice right back for a team we will be playing in the same division as. Stacey isn’t good enough in my opinion but I’d sooner keep him on than sign Fredericks, at least we won’t still be lumbered with him if we go down. This signing doesn’t make sense, the only logical justification is too add PL experience but even that isn’t entirely logical as we don’t exactly lack that anyway. Very happy with Rothwell, Fredericks is very disappointing. We are being linked with Matt Ritchie too, if that one turns out to be true then I’d start to question the strategy going into this season. We need young proven championship players with the ability to make the step up who will be able to get us back if we go down and provide resale value. We don’t need past it players who we are only going to be lumbered with on big wages if we are to go down.
No problem with signing players on a free, if they are good enough. Rothwell would be a very good signing, one of the most creative midfielders in the championship last season and just hitting his prime. Fredericks is injury prone, past his peak, will be 30 in September and was third choice right back for a team we will be playing in the same division as. Stacey isn’t good enough in my opinion but I’d sooner keep him on than sign Fredericks, at least we won’t still be lumbered with him if we go down. This signing doesn’t make sense, the only logical justification is too add PL experience but even that isn’t entirely logical as we don’t exactly lack that anyway. Very happy with Rothwell, Fredericks is very disappointing. We are being linked with Matt Ritchie too, if that one turns out to be true then I’d start to question the strategy going into this season. We need young proven championship players with the ability to make the step up who will be able to get us back if we go down and provide resale value. We don’t need past it players who we are only going to be lumbered with on big wages if we are to go down.
Ritchie 2 years ago and in the Championship, yes by all means. 2 years on and for the PL? No chance. Wishing him well though.[
I’m hoping Ritchie is just the usual transfer window ‘well he has a house in the new forest’ ridiculous link.
Although he’s not going to be in Newcastles plans for much longer regardless