Non - Pandemic

Scientists advising the World Health Organisation have recommended the use of the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in adults of all ages.

The WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunisation has issued interim recommendations on the vaccine, saying that the jab could be given to people aged 18 and above "without an upper age limit".

"That means people over the age of 65 years of age should be given the vaccination," the group's chairman Dr Alejandro Cravioto told a press briefing.


https://news.sky.com/story/oxford-a...vising-the-world-health-organisation-12214373
 
Scientists advising the World Health Organisation have recommended the use of the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in adults of all ages.

The WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunisation has issued interim recommendations on the vaccine, saying that the jab could be given to people aged 18 and above "without an upper age limit".

"That means people over the age of 65 years of age should be given the vaccination," the group's chairman Dr Alejandro Cravioto told a press briefing.

https://news.sky.com/story/oxford-a...vising-the-world-health-organisation-12214373
Wonder if that will prompt a U turn from many EU countries that without evidence banned it for their over 65's. Hope not, more vaccines for us if they don't !!
 
Wonder if that will prompt a U turn from many EU countries that without evidence banned it for their over 65's. Hope not, more vaccines for us if they don't !!

It makes you wonder who they were/are going to give the 9 million extra ordered of the AZ vaccine that they are not sure about.
 
Wonder if that will prompt a U turn from many EU countries that without evidence banned it for their over 65's. Hope not, more vaccines for us if they don't !!

I think that's stretching it a bit. They wasn't a lot of evidence either way for older people, which is why they wanted further studies. Same as American regulators.
 
He’s on a hiding to nothing here though. I suspect that John (I may be biased as I‘ve met him a few times via work) was asked directly whether it was possible for this to happen. He’d be remiss to say it cannot possibly happen when no-one knows and so then the story gets aired with potential spin. I haven’t seen the interview, but it wouldn’t surprise me if there were caveats such as, although the chance is likely to be greatly reduced, or that it is likely any reinfection would be less severe,

what would we answer if someone asked us if it is possible that Bournemouth to win the FA Cup and win automatic promotion this season? We all know it may happen, but that it isn’t likely, but we’ve said it may happen.
 
Covered on South Today yesterday and in The Echo today the BIC vaccination centre not running any where near capacity and closing early because GP's are routing patients to themselves. I didn't have a letter just a phone call and no choice my jab was at one of the practise group other surgeries. My cousin had a text but was given a link so chose St Leonards as her choice. Such a pity that the spare unused capacity isn't being used to make inroads in the next groups.
 
Covered on South Today yesterday and in The Echo today the BIC vaccination centre not running any where near capacity and closing early because GP's are routing patients to themselves. I didn't have a letter just a phone call and no choice my jab was at one of the practise group other surgeries. My cousin had a text but was given a link so chose St Leonards as her choice. Such a pity that the spare unused capacity isn't being used to make inroads in the next groups.

Just because the facility is there it doesn’t mean the supply of vaccine is.

When it’s opened up to the other priority groups, supply depending, I’m sure having the option of GP surgeries, pharmacies, vaccination centres will be a great asset.

My parents (not Dorset and not top 4 priority groups) have had a text to say that their date and time will come in the post and that will be at their specially set up vaccination centre and not at their GP surgery.
 
Covered on South Today yesterday and in The Echo today the BIC vaccination centre not running any where near capacity and closing early because GP's are routing patients to themselves. I didn't have a letter just a phone call and no choice my jab was at one of the practise group other surgeries. My cousin had a text but was given a link so chose St Leonards as her choice. Such a pity that the spare unused capacity isn't being used to make inroads in the next groups.

Read that Ron and the two paras at the bottom.

Can only speak from my own experience, in Christchurch a number of surgeries including the one I go to joined together to deliver the first vaccine released the Pfizer one to the over 80’s etc.

I received my letter a time later when they came down the groups to mine, phoned up and was told the nearest place to myself was a local pharmacy next to the hospital and appointment was booked for me plus the second one in April.

A week later and two days before my jab I received a phone call from my local surgery asking if I would like to go on the Saturday for my covid jab. Thanked the lady and mentioned I had already booked at the pharmacy. No pressure put on me to go to surgery instead.

This week I had an appointment at our surgery and there was a notice for patients coming for Covid jabs, in conversation with the nurse it seemed now our surgery had received some doses of the AZ vaccine, so I asked should I be coming to them for my second dose, the reply was, no go to the pharmacy where you have booked. So again no pressure to cancel and go to the surgery.

Sorry for the long reply but just putting the case of how our local surgery handled it.


Bournemouth East MP Tobias Ellwood’s comments came after he earlier voiced “frustration” that the vaccination centre at the BIC was closing early because of a lack of people turning up for jabs.

He has claimed GPs were encouraging patients to wait to have their vaccinations at the surgery because they are paid £20 per jab – a claim denied by the British Medical Association (BMA), which says they are paid £12.58.
 
Read that Ron and the two paras at the bottom.

Can only speak from my own experience, in Christchurch a number of surgeries including the one I go to joined together to deliver the first vaccine released the Pfizer one to the over 80’s etc.

I received my letter a time later when they came down the groups to mine, phoned up and was told the nearest place to myself was a local pharmacy next to the hospital and appointment was booked for me plus the second one in April.

A week later and two days before my jab I received a phone call from my local surgery asking if I would like to go on the Saturday for my covid jab. Thanked the lady and mentioned I had already booked at the pharmacy. No pressure put on me to go to surgery instead.

This week I had an appointment at our surgery and there was a notice for patients coming for Covid jabs, in conversation with the nurse it seemed now our surgery had received some doses of the AZ vaccine, so I asked should I be coming to them for my second dose, the reply was, no go to the pharmacy where you have booked. So again no pressure to cancel and go to the surgery.

Sorry for the long reply but just putting the case of how our local surgery handled it.


Bournemouth East MP Tobias Ellwood’s comments came after he earlier voiced “frustration” that the vaccination centre at the BIC was closing early because of a lack of people turning up for jabs.

He has claimed GPs were encouraging patients to wait to have their vaccinations at the surgery because they are paid £20 per jab – a claim denied by the British Medical Association (BMA), which says they are paid £12.58.

Yet more proof ,if it was needed, that Tobias Ellwood is a cock. The payment is only received if the patient has both jabs and GPs arent going to make a significant profit if at all [I am not a partner so am not making any profit or loss apart as such, unless you count all the extra hours I am working for nothing] PS Tobias Ellwood is also a ****************
 
Yet more proof ,if it was needed, that Tobias Ellwood is a cock. The payment is only received if the patient has both jabs and GPs arent going to make a significant profit if at all [I am not a partner so am not making any profit or loss apart as such, unless you count all the extra hours I am working for nothing] PS Tobias Ellwood is also a ****************
Tobias Ellwood has been bitter since the Brexit vote.
 
Booking early not an option....

It is "too early" to know whether summer holidays can go ahead, the health secretary has said.
Matt Hancock said there was still "a lot of uncertainty" but ministers were doing everything possible to make sure people could have a holiday this year.
He told the BBC he had booked his own summer break in Cornwall "months ago".
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer urged the government to "get rid of the mixed messages" about whether people should book holidays for later in the year.
Some Tory MPs and businesses also criticised the government for fuelling uncertainty for travel companies already struggling in the pandemic.
It follows confusion after Transport Secretary Grant Shapps warned "people shouldn't be booking holidays right now - not domestically or internationally".
Covid-19: 'Too early' to decide on summer holidays, says Hancock - BBC News
 
Stay Home only travel for essential work....

The government confirmed two civil servants and a special adviser on staff take pictures of both the PM and other government ministers as they work in the corridors of power.
Previous pictures of the the prime minister with Dilyn at Chequers, which were released earlier this year, were taken by Andrew Parsons - a party political special adviser who works part-time but earns the full-time equivalent of £100,000-£104,999.
More pictures of the dog were taken by Pippa Fowles, a Ministry of Defence photographer seconded to No 10.

A third photographer was recruited recently after being advertised with a salary of up to £60,635-a-year.

Asked why taxpayer funded staff were required to take pictures of the prime ministerial pets, a Downing Street spokesperson said photographers “document the work of not just the prime minister but the whole of the Cabinet”.
Pressed on what work the animals did for the government, the spokesman said: “I point you back to what I have already said.”

The government has not previously made any announcements to suggest Larry, who carries the title of Chief Mouser to the Cabinet Office, or Dilyn, who is a dog, are considered full cabinet ministers.

A Labour source said: “The government has made such a dog’s dinner of issues from the border response to kids’ education, Dilyn would be a marked improvement and probably waste less taxpayers’ cash.”

While salaries of the photographers caused a headache for No 10, the images themselves that prompted a breach in Downing Street's security - with one displaying the phone number of the prime minister’s fiancé, Carrie Symonds.

The photograph, taken by Ms Fowles, has since been taken down, but the number remained active following the breach, according to the PA news agency.

A third photographer, recruited recently after being advertised with a salary of up to £60,635-a-year, has been tasked with taking images across government.

Deputy Labour leader Angela Rayner said: “The public will be rightly questioning why there is apparently no limit on the money that can be found to pay for a coterie of vanity photographers for the prime minister.”

Asked why press photographers could not do the job, the Downing Street spokesman said: “It is obviously important that we record the activity of the government and… we make these pictures available for editorial use.

“You are aware that we allow for other photographers to accompany ministers and prime ministers on visits also.”

Downing Street defends employing taxpayer-funded photographers to take photos of Boris Johnson’s dog (msn.com)
 
He’s on a hiding to nothing here though. I suspect that John (I may be biased as I‘ve met him a few times via work) was asked directly whether it was possible for this to happen. He’d be remiss to say it cannot possibly happen when no-one knows and so then the story gets aired with potential spin. I haven’t seen the interview, but it wouldn’t surprise me if there were caveats such as, although the chance is likely to be greatly reduced, or that it is likely any reinfection would be less severe,

what would we answer if someone asked us if it is possible that Bournemouth to win the FA Cup and win automatic promotion this season? We all know it may happen, but that it isn’t likely, but we’ve said it may happen.

Sounds like literally every interaction I've witnessed between a scientist and a journalist. It appears no coincidence they call their reports "stories"
 

;