Non - Pandemic

afcdibby said:
You should at least read the tweet before copying and pasting it.
Click to expand...

It’s a guys interpretation of the data. You’re free to make your own interpretations.

Can’t say I can be quite so blasé about 760 odd hospitalisations a day as some.

But it’s fair to say the real impact of the restrictions being lifted was moving from step 2 rather than moving to step 4.
 
RobTrent said:
I believe they were models? Mis-information would be saying there are 100k cases now wouldn't it?
Click to expand...

It was “a” model, there were others, some worse some better.

For example the graphs I was posting and were slated by some, only showed the potential for 50,000 by July based on whether or not step 4 came on the date that was eventually delayed.

The peak was around 60,000.

I dare say if someone put something together for all the trends and models and published an average number they might have been very accurate indeed...but that doesn’t make headlines to prove a point.
 
DJ said:
It was “a” model, there were others, some worse some better.

For example the graphs I was posting and were slated by some, only showed the potential for 50,000 by July based on whether or not step 4 came on the date that was eventually delayed.

The peak was around 60,000.

I dare say if someone put something together for all the trends and models and published an average number they might have been very accurate indeed...but that doesn’t make headlines to prove a point.
Click to expand...
The peak was 54,600, you could say around 50,000, but 60,000 does sound better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

;