VAR has been a pain for a long time. But today really got to me. I’m not angry or frustrated, although I was. I just feel kind of sad, maybe helpless, resigned even about what is being lost.
If the Arsenal penalty was one then there should be 100s more than there are. It was a dive. A trailing foot deliberately making contact with a stationary leg that was flat on the ground. Cheating, simulation, a dive.
If Dom fouled the keeper then there should be 20 penalties every game. If the incident had been the other way would we have had a penalty? Of course not. And we wouldn’t have expected it.
If billing wasn’t fouled then how can Dom’s be a foul?
Both decisions were wrong. I don’t understand the clear and obvious error thing. Is being wrong not enough. If the first one wasn’t a foul then it wasn’t. If the ref though it was a foul and it wasn’t the. It was an error. Pretty clear and pretty obvious.
And the commentators go along with it. Call it for what it is. Two wrong decisions that deprived us of a really good game.
Would Arsenal have won? Almost certainly. But it’s not about the result it’s about the way that they’re ruining the game.
To make things worse, I still don’t get a ‘reject all’ button to enable to use this site on my IPod. Very frustrating.Enraged!!!!
From the start I would say that Arsenal probably deserved to win, but:
The penalty was a complete joke. Havartz has totally conned the ref and VAR!! How could they give it, I honestly don’t know. (NB: Arsenal have been given 6 penalties in the last 8 games -not surprising if the refs are as gullible as todays)
The decision to disallow our ‘goal’ is also unfathomable. The keeper charged out and made a complete Horlicks of it , with minimal, if not any contact. It had to be a goal or a penalty to us as Billing had been pulled all over the place just beforehand. Goal disallowed.
It did look like Christie did tag Sako but after all their diving who could tell.
Second half we really pushed hard. Just a shame that we were playing against 12 man AND VAR!!
But VAR could tell him he's wrong?To be fair, the ref gave the pen. The ref ruled out the goal. The ref gave Scott a yellow when he didnt touch the arsenal player.
VAR is an issue that needs resolving but it was the ref who had a shock AGAIN today. He really is the worst ref in this league. I dont understand how he keeps getting games when he always makes mistakes.
"It's not football any more" sums it upVAR has been a pain for a long time. But today really got to me. I’m not angry or frustrated, although I was. I just feel kind of sad, maybe helpless, resigned even about what is being lost.
If the Arsenal penalty was one then there should be 100s more than there are. It was a dive. A trailing foot deliberately making contact with a stationary leg that was flat on the ground. Cheating, simulation, a dive.
If Dom fouled the keeper then there should be 20 penalties every game. If the incident had been the other way would we have had a penalty? Of course not. And we wouldn’t have expected it.
If billing wasn’t fouled then how can Dom’s be a foul?
Both decisions were wrong. I don’t understand the clear and obvious error thing. Is being wrong not enough. If the first one wasn’t a foul then it wasn’t. If the ref though it was a foul and it wasn’t the. It was an error. Pretty clear and pretty obvious.
And the commentators go along with it. Call it for what it is. Two wrong decisions that deprived us of a really good game.
Would Arsenal have won? Almost certainly. But it’s not about the result it’s about the way that they’re ruining the game.
But VAR could tell him he's wrong?
Wish I could like this twice. Exactly what I feel. Gone beyond getting angry about it. I wonder how many other products exist in the world with none of its customers wanting it.VAR has been a pain for a long time. But today really got to me. I’m not angry or frustrated, although I was. I just feel kind of sad, maybe helpless, resigned even about what is being lost.
If the Arsenal penalty was one then there should be 100s more than there are. It was a dive. A trailing foot deliberately making contact with a stationary leg that was flat on the ground. Cheating, simulation, a dive.
If Dom fouled the keeper then there should be 20 penalties every game. If the incident had been the other way would we have had a penalty? Of course not. And we wouldn’t have expected it.
If billing wasn’t fouled then how can Dom’s be a foul?
Both decisions were wrong. I don’t understand the clear and obvious error thing. Is being wrong not enough. If the first one wasn’t a foul then it wasn’t. If the ref though it was a foul and it wasn’t the. It was an error. Pretty clear and pretty obvious.
And the commentators go along with it. Call it for what it is. Two wrong decisions that deprived us of a really good game.
Would Arsenal have won? Almost certainly. But it’s not about the result it’s about the way that they’re ruining the game.
I think the problem is how var is used....if the ref gives that in years gone by you would say oh well the ref got conned ....call the opposing player a cheating cnt and move on...we've seen plenty of our own players do it tbf......but how can var look at a player clearly diving to win a penalty and not intervene?......it's absolutely bonkers.....it couldn't be more 'clear and obvious' .......at least advise the ref to go and have a look at it.......either scrap var or let var make all the decisions inside the box.......this var merely backing up refs opinions can't go on.To be fair, the ref gave the pen. The ref ruled out the goal. The ref gave Scott a yellow when he didnt touch the arsenal player.
VAR is an issue that needs resolving but it was the ref who had a shock AGAIN today. He really is the worst ref in this league. I dont understand how he keeps getting games when he always makes mistakes.
This. The only point in Video officiating in any sport is to clear stuff up with the benefit of multiple angles and time. In every other sport it clears stuff up. In football in this county it just obfuscates it further. Thats just bonkers.I think the problem is how var is used....if the ref gives that in years gone by you would say oh well the ref got conned ....call the opposing player a cheating cnt and move on...we've seen plenty of our own players do it tbf......but how can var look at a player clearly diving to win a penalty and not intervene?......it's absolutely bonkers.....it couldn't be more 'clear and obvious' .......at least advise the ref to go and have a look at it.......either scrap var or let var make all the decisions inside the box.......this var merely backing up refs opinions can't go on.
Brilliant post, and Audenshaw’s too, I couldn’t agree more.VAR has been a pain for a long time. But today really got to me. I’m not angry or frustrated, although I was. I just feel kind of sad, maybe helpless, resigned even about what is being lost.
If the Arsenal penalty was one then there should be 100s more than there are. It was a dive. A trailing foot deliberately making contact with a stationary leg that was flat on the ground. Cheating, simulation, a dive.
If Dom fouled the keeper then there should be 20 penalties every game. If the incident had been the other way would we have had a penalty? Of course not. And we wouldn’t have expected it.
If billing wasn’t fouled then how can Dom’s be a foul?
Both decisions were wrong. I don’t understand the clear and obvious error thing. Is being wrong not enough. If the first one wasn’t a foul then it wasn’t. If the ref though it was a foul and it wasn’t the. It was an error. Pretty clear and pretty obvious.
And the commentators go along with it. Call it for what it is. Two wrong decisions that deprived us of a really good game.
Would Arsenal have won? Almost certainly. But it’s not about the result it’s about the way that they’re ruining the game.
They must spend hours in training working on the stride pattern to leave a leg trailing like thatBrilliant post, and Audenshaw’s too, I couldn’t agree more.
Just to see if we’re making too much of a fuss about this, I’ve just watched both incidents back on Sky which we recorded, and can’t believe how those decisions were made. Really disappointing Havertz admitting he only “went down” because he “felt a touch” (and we’re not talking Dibby’s touch on Table here), and the pundits saying how clever he was to get the pen. No- it’s CHEATING, it’s simple, it’s cheating. Travers did not bring Havertz down, Havertz decided to go down when he didn’t need to, he wasn’t tripped, he wasn’t overbalanced, so in reality is a dive. Shocking decision, license to con refs and the crowd, and a stain on the game. And our disallowed goal- where do you start? Two wrong decisions- obvious foul on Phil Bill then no foul on Raya.
Yes, maybe Arsenal would’ve won, but it feels like we were really cheated and weren’t given a chance to compete. Christie’s rake on Saka BTW- should’ve been a yellow IMO- Arsenal fans calling for a red must’ve been in the sun too long.
If a contentious var decision goes against a big club, it makes the news and officials are removed from their posts. If a contentious decision goes against a small club, the world moves on and nobody bats an eyelid. What would you do if you were a ref or a var official?Having calmed down a bit, I was thinking about VAR decisions in our favour this season. We've had a few, recently against Everton and Wolves off the top of my head. But have we ever, ever had a contentious decision go for us against a big 6 club? If so I can't remember it
probably still jetlagged after the overnighter from KL. Christie’s rake on Saka BTW- should’ve been a yellow IMO- Arsenal fans calling for a red must’ve been in the sun too long.
Not really, Neil. It is still contentious in all the NA sports, I'd say NBA is worst but that might be my bias. NFL is often a joke, compromised by unclear (and annually changing) rules, especially pass interference and what constitutes a "legal catch". MLB and NHL not bad, but still can be very long reviews which implies that the call on the field (or the ice) was not obviously incorrect (baseball has the safe/out call, especially at first base where it is very often "bang-bang" and the analysis includes super slo-mo to determine did the foot get down on the bag before the ball gets into the glove, with the latter coloured by "into the glove" meaning within the normal pocket of the glove if not necessarily yet caught).This. The only point in Video officiating in any sport is to clear stuff up with the benefit of multiple angles and time. In every other sport it clears stuff up. In football in this county it just obfuscates it further. Thats just bonkers.
I don't know why but I just remembered the penalty at Liverpool reading this, another dive, with clear air between players.Having calmed down a bit, I was thinking about VAR decisions in our favour this season. We've had a few, recently against Everton and Wolves off the top of my head. But have we ever, ever had a contentious decision go for us against a big 6 club? If so I can't remember it