clintclease
First Team
On COWS highlights of the game there is a very good close up of the officials discussing their decision - can anyone lip read what they are saying?
LewSwimmin - 28/12/2017 10:01
I'm not a lip reader, but as the lino was best placed to judge whether or not it was offside the ref would not have over ruled him on that issue.
My guess is that the lino thought that Callum was just onside but instead flagged for hand ball, which the ref was better placed to make a judgement on, and that he considered that Callum had not made a deliberate attempt to play the ball with his hand or arm as it came over his head and just brushed his upper arm and so allowed the goal to stand.
It probably took so long because of all the players surrounding the officials who had to be moved away before they could have a sensible discussion.
DJ - 28/12/2017 12:17
Deliberate or not the laws are pretty clear when it comes to a goal being scored with handball involved. Just have to think back to the Arsenal game last year.
DJ - 28/12/2017 12:17
Deliberate or not the laws are pretty clear when it comes to a goal being scored with handball involved. Just have to think back to the Arsenal game last year.
Druss_the_Legend - 28/12/2017 18:35
DJ - 28/12/2017 12:17
Deliberate or not the laws are pretty clear when it comes to a goal being scored with handball involved. Just have to think back to the Arsenal game last year.
No it doesnt? It doesnt mention handball and goal scoring?
If its not deliberate then its not a handball. Callum doesnt move his arm. Its not even clear how much contact there was.
As I've said already, if thats deemed a free kick then we should have had 2 penalties for 2 accidental handballs by West Ham too.