Danny Drinkwater?

[Sweetcherrity]

Newsnow article suggesting we should sign him (and saying we were previously interested in him).

"It’s why the club needs to reignite interest in Danny Drinkwater, with the 29-year-old struggling to do much since his move to Chelsea. Linked with a move to Bournemouth a few months ago by the Daily Mail, nothing has ever materialised yet".

Should we...

 

[Topfarrier]

No....we've enough slow side ways passing Midfielders tbf.

 

[Sweetcherrity]

but they're always injured

 

[NWCherries98]

 

[cockbeard]

Way too expensive, he's supposedly on crazy wages, 6 figures a week

 

[MarineBoy1]

No

 

[cherrycarl2004]

below 80k a week, yes. anything more, no.

 

[andyred]

below 80k a week, yes. anything more, no.

Below 30k maybe

 

[Hillviewred]

Could do worse

 

[AFCB Lost in Brum]

Yes. Good challenge for him and a title winner, so brings experience

 

[yesyescherry]

off to everton i thought

don’t think eh would even consider it anyway - doesn’t fit the profile

 

[Sweetcherrity]

were we ever interested in him? I don't remember

 

[ErikthViking]

He does not live up to his name, though, does he?

Taxi!

 

[Sweetcherrity]

...so it's a no then

 

[NWCherries98]

...so it's a no then

Yes.

Well, no.

 

[northstandmark]

Frank Lampard 'set' to be appointed at Chelsea according to reports, so a new manager will have some bearing on Drinkwater's future.

 

[hba1]

As will no doubt their transfer embargo.

 

[AFCB Lost in Brum]

As will no doubt their transfer embargo.

I'm willing to be proved wrong but I thought that although Chelsea couldn't buy players they could still sell them.

Of course Chelsea would then have to assess whether selling during that period would be wise.

However, they had about 40 players out on loan last season, so they're not exactly short-handed.