An interesting thread as always, but doesn't seem to factor in the potential takeover, where the Board have rightly indicated they'll hold fire on a new manager's appointment until the new owners are in the saddle, as they may have their own ideas on the style/calibre/kudos of manager. So far as Gary O'Neil is concerned, I'm not in the "give him the job" camp for all the reasons everyone else ha already said, but I think we need a middle way - something a bit more concrete than game-by-game but no so permanent as a two/three/four year deal. What about a contract until the end of the year? Then he can plan more than just one training routine! Oh, and as for manager of the month - I think he deserves it, but historically it's usually been a poisoned chalice with a number of defeats following the award - no logic in that I know, but just noticed that's the way it often falls in the past.