stanthevan
UTC Legend
After heightened security at Wimbledon causes long queues will all sporting venues including Premier League grounds suffer the same fate. Could this be Just Stop Oil's long game?
After heightened security at Wimbledon causes long queues will all sporting venues including Premier League grounds suffer the same fate. Could this be Just Stop Oil's long game?
After heightened security at Wimbledon causes long queues will all sporting venues including Premier League grounds suffer the same fate. Could this be Just Stop Oil's long game?
Like driving to peoples houses and asking nicely?Not the way to win the public over, it has done the complete opposite.
Just stop oil's campaign has to be the most counter productive in history, far from getting people behind their cause it's simply led to most of the population disliking the protesters. All that time and effort to achieve less than nothing.
Is there any evidence that their protests have changed public views? Unpopular protests might be seen as effective by them but so far all they seem to have achieved is increased support for stringent anti protest laws.Far from counter productive. They don't want to be liked. In their minds they have already achieved something and that is publicity and keeping the discourse going. They will point to other unpopular groups in history who ultimately brought about societal change.
If you're wondering why they don't just protest peacefully, they do that too. It just doesn't get the same impactful publicity.
The point is that they want people to dislike their protests. They want people to complain and get the government to somehow put a stop to it. The more people get pissed off, the more the government are forced to take action. They either have to take the Braverman approach of introducing draconian laws or they have to take action to stop the use of fossil fuels. The former would affect us all. You may be denied the right to protest if Shell want to demolish your neighbourhood to build an oil refinery.Is there any evidence that their protests have changed public views? Unpopular protests might be seen as effective by them but so far all they seem to have achieved is increased support for stringent anti protest laws.
I get the point about disruptive protest getting publicity but there is a balance where if it gets too disruptive all you do is piss people off and it doesn't matter how legitimate your cause is they simply stop listening to you. How many football fans do you think will be interested in Just Oil's cause if they disrupted a match at Dean Court? Vast majority would simply be annoyed and just want them off the pitch asap.
They also might have a bit more public sympathy if they also targeted the super rich private jet and super yacht travelling elite rather than simply ordinary members of the public.
I get that but the government aren't going to cave into them so what will happen is more and more draconian laws being introduced to try and curb the protests. As you quite rightly pointed out this will result in all of us losing some of our democratic right to protest so really just stop oil's legacy will be is that they will have made it harder to protest going forward.The point is that they want people to dislike their protests. They want people to complain and get the government to somehow put a stop to it. The more people get pissed off, the more the government are forced to take action. They either have to take the Braverman approach of introducing draconian laws or they have to take action to stop the use of fossil fuels. The former would affect us all. You may be denied the right to protest if Shell want to demolish your neighbourhood to build an oil refinery.
A rather large hole in this logic is it assumes the general public have any confidence in them stopping protest regardless of central government policy.The point is that they want people to dislike their protests. They want people to complain and get the government to somehow put a stop to it. The more people get pissed off, the more the government are forced to take action. They either have to take the Braverman approach of introducing draconian laws or they have to take action to stop the use of fossil fuels. The former would affect us all. You may be denied the right to protest if Shell want to demolish your neighbourhood to build an oil refinery.
Is there any evidence that their protests have changed public views? Unpopular protests might be seen as effective by them but so far all they seem to have achieved is increased support for stringent anti protest laws.
I get the point about disruptive protest getting publicity but there is a balance where if it gets too disruptive all you do is piss people off and it doesn't matter how legitimate your cause is they simply stop listening to you. How many football fans do you think will be interested in Just Oil's cause if they disrupted a match at Dean Court? Vast majority would simply be annoyed and just want them off the pitch asap.
They also might have a bit more public sympathy if they also targeted the super rich private jet and super yacht travelling elite rather than simply ordinary members of the public.
I get that but the government aren't going to cave into them so what will happen is more and more draconian laws being introduced to try and curb the protests. As you quite rightly pointed out this will result in all of us losing some of our democratic right to protest so really just stop oil's legacy will be is that they will have made it harder to protest going forward.
Perhaps the delays were because they hired AFCB as consultants.After heightened security at Wimbledon causes long queues will all sporting venues including Premier League grounds suffer the same fate. Could this be Just Stop Oil's long game?
I don't agree with the curbs but was simply pointing out that these are an inevitable result of the relentless nature of just stop oil's protests.Their legacy will be to show this Tory government for what it is, i.e. greenwashing and ultimately putting profit before human rights. People aren't going to stand by and elect a party who are eroding their basic rights. The tide is turning.
I think Labour will be greener than the Tories but that’s not really difficult to achieve. I also believe that they won’t change any draconian laws. Governments hate protests and strikes, whatever the colour of their rosette and keeping the people quiet is always a major goal.I don't agree with the curbs but was simply pointing out that these are an inevitable result of the relentless nature of just stop oil's protests.
Are you expecting that Labour will repeal these measures if elected?
I don't agree with the curbs but was simply pointing out that these are an inevitable result of the relentless nature of just stop oil's protests.
Are you expecting that Labour will repeal these measures if elected?