Saints want Ake

[AlGard]

£35M

They have the spare cash now.

Perhaps they can try an illegal approach like Liverpool did for Judas Van Dyke.

 

[AFCB_REPUBLICAN]

They would never be so unscrupulous. :halo:

 

[johnbob]

Just say no, king was on spurs radar and we said no, here say but

 

[Chris2001]

Who says?

 

[yesyescherry]

saints don’t want ake

someone on twitter said they should go in for him, that’s all

 

[sainti]

Hoedt was bought in the Summer as the VVD replacement, if we spend in January it will be on attacking players.

 

[Topfarrier]

Yes but Al said so..... That makes it a fact..... I'm worried.

 

[AlGard]

As you can quite clearly see it's a post more about the disgusting way Liverpool have gone about forcing this transfer over the last year.

And it does say "perhaps Southampton should make an illegal approach"

Some people haven't got the krypton Factor of a postage stamp.

 

[AFCBade]

sainti - 27/12/2017 20:38

Hoedt was bought in the Summer as the VVD replacement, if we spend in January it will be on attacking players.

You would think Saints would let him go but not to Liverpool given past dealings. Must be frustrating to keep losing star players but saints are very wise in selling assets at top prices; for example can’t help feeling we should have sold king for big money in the summer and bought two decent players. The danger is you sell too many too quickly.

 

[tedisking]

Another Al backtrack

 

[redharry]

AlGard - 28/12/2017 07:13

As you can quite clearly see it's a post more about the disgusting way Liverpool have gone about forcing this transfer over the last year.

And it does say "perhaps Southampton should make an illegal approach"

Some people haven't got the krypton Factor of a postage stamp.

So why is the post headed "Saints want Ake" ?

 

[TrevorMorganFanClub]

If only there was some way of proving it wasn't an actual FACT in the form of a small icon
:emoticon: :clown: :80:


Don't forget to backtrack again Al if they do show an interest :35:

 

[blandford_cherry]

AlGard - 28/12/2017 07:13

As you can quite clearly see it's a post more about the disgusting way Liverpool have gone about forcing this transfer over the last year.

And it does say "perhaps Southampton should make an illegal approach"

Some people haven't got the krypton Factor of a postage stamp.

Post is More about the disgusting way Liverpool have gone about their transfer?

Check the title of the post...bit misleading

 

[NWCherries98]

If it's about Liverpool and their "morals":

1. Where's the "non" in the thread title?
2. Who gives a f***? I know I don't.