Scott Dann

Topfarrier said:
I"m not sure what to expect from Marcondes tbh......I just thought Anthony had more of a chance of replicating Stan's numbers rather than Danjuma's..... talking of numbers I saw that Stan had a pass completion stat of 80% last season!......that's absolutely phenomenal for a forward player.....to put that into context Arnie and Solanke were on 70%.....you'd imagine that a manager who puts a lot of emphasis on possession would want to keep a player like that.
Click to expand...
I’d imagine that he might. But Stan clearly doesn’t want to be here if at all possible, not sure you can twist that one to blame Parker.
 
Waz afcb said:
I’d imagine that he might. But Stan clearly doesn’t want to be here if at all possible, not sure you can twist that one to blame Parker.
Click to expand...
We don't know what Stan wants..maybe he wants a longer deal?... maybe he doesn't want to take such a pay cut ...who knows ?....I'd imagine a deal could be done.
Not sure what I said about Parker in that post to warrant that reply tbh... very strange.
 
Topfarrier said:
We don't know what Stan wants..maybe he wants a longer deal?... maybe he doesn't want to take such a pay cut ...who knows ?....I'd imagine a deal could be done.
Not sure what I said about Parker in that post to warrant that reply tbh... very strange.
Click to expand...
Your last sentence implied that it could be Parker who is deciding not to push to keep him, given your constant criticism of him it really isn’t a great leap to make is it?
The athletic reported that Stan is holding out for a Prem move, they are one of the few reliable sources out there.
 
Waz afcb said:
Your last sentence implied that it could be Parker who is deciding not to push to keep him, given your constant criticism of him it really isn’t a great leap to make is it?
The athletic reported that Stan is holding out for a Prem move, they are one of the few reliable sources out there.
Click to expand...
Lol I didn't imply any such thing....I was merely pointing out that Stan has qualities that Parker would find attractive....if anything it implies that if we don't sign Stan it wouldn't be down to a lack of effort from Parker.
You feeling alright Waza?
 
Topfarrier said:
Lol I didn't imply any such thing....I was merely pointing out that Stan has qualities that Parker would find attractive....if anything it implies that if we don't sign Stan it wouldn't be down to a lack of effort from Parker.
You feeling alright Waza?
Click to expand...
Fine thanks Tozza. Apologies for the misinterpretation, I am so used to seeing anti Parker rhetoric from you that I made an incorrect assumption. Apologies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

;