Spurs v AFC Bournemouth - Sunday 2 pm

I only listened on the radio so have likely missed a lot, but in beginning to put the stats together I'm not clear what formation we played. See the figure below, was there a reason why the players were clumped on our left hand side? Is it just that average positions can be confusing? Philip (29) and Semenyo (24) both had similar positions to Kluivert (17) and Sinisterra (19) in that substitution so it looks a plan, but Aarons' position (37) is noticeably different from Ouattara's (11). When Brooks (7) came on for Smith (15), did we move to a back three? Did Tav (16) move across to the left side having previously been on the right?

Whatever we played, it sounded attacking! Most penalty area touches, joint most successful crosses and most attempts this season

View attachment 12919
Our strategy first half was to have Sinistera and Kluivert as a close left hand side pairing with Dango overlapping whenever possible.

This worked well as the Spurs right back seemed to play a more tucked in role close to the right hand side back four man.

This left hand attacking went slightly off track as Aaron's came on for the second half to replace the injured Dango and proceeded to hardly cross the half way line.

The game changer was the unenforced substitution of Sinistera and Kluivert with Billing and Semenyo just after the hour. This just seems to have been a repetition of an hourly substitution routine which we had employed in our recent matches. Until the game was lost our attacks down the left fizzled out and Spurs came more into the game. Out of the blue Lo Celso's through ball found Son in acres of space because three of our back four had moved up to catch him offside but Aarons, out of position at left back, had played him onside. Aarons was then caught wrong footed in the build up to the third.

Surprisingly Brooks came on last change rather than Moore but when Brooks got the ball on the right wing he would cut back inside and play useful diagonal balls over to our left.

Scott's goal was a well worked team goal with a number of passes starting again on our left hand side.

One thing worth mentioning from the first half when we were dominating play was that Solanke needed attention after a bad clash of heads. Shortly afterwards he miss timed a header from inside the six yard box which could have been down to this knock.

A draw would have been a fair result but Spurs put away the three good chances they had which was the difference between the two teams.
 
Last edited:
Well I guess when you have players who can score in abundance and they click this happens!
That said a battling effort from us and 3-1 flattered them so much!
Neto 5.5 poor clearance for their opener
Smith 5.5 not great let Son dominate him and a bit slow in the tackles
Zarbyarni 6 okay but tricky time throughout
Senesi 6.5 did okay and had some good efforts going forward
Dango 7 another good showing until his unfortunate knock
Tavernier 6 seems to have lost his mojo somewhat?
Cook 6 not as good as his recent games
Christie 6 as with Lewis not as dominant
Sinisterra 7 gave us some bright moments final ball a bit frustrating at times
Kluivert 6.5 busy but wasteful with the ball in the final third
Solanke 6.5 not his usual sharp self in this one looked knackered at the end forced a good save with a header

Scott 7 made a difference in attack well taken goal and unlucky with the offside goal
Semenyo 6 some flashes but his final ball was weak
Brooks 6 some decent balls into the box which got us a few corners near the end
Arrons 6 pace in attack linked well at times
Billing 6 unable to influence the game much

Referee 4 Him again bit fussy and let their gamesmanship fool him…not one of my favourites!
 
Our strategy first half was to have Sinistera and Kluivert as a close left hand side pairing with Dango overlapping whenever possible.

This worked well as the Spurs right back seemed to play a more tucked in role close to the right hand side back four man.

This left hand attacking went slightly off track as Aaron's came on for the second half to replace the injured Dango and proceeded to hardly cross the half way line.

The game changer was the unenforced substitution of Sinistera and Kluivert with Billing and Semenyo just after the hour. This just seems to have been a repetition of an hourly substitution routine which we had employed in our recent matches. Until the game was lost our attacks down the left fizzled out and Spurs came more into the game. Out of the blue Lo Celso's through ball found Son in acres of space because three of our back four had moved up to catch him offside but Aarons, out of position at left back, had played him onside. Aarons was then caught wrong footed in the build up to the third.

Surprisingly Brooks came on last change rather than Moore but when Brooks got the ball on the right wing he would cut back inside and play useful diagonal balls over to our left.

Scott's goal was a well worked team goal with a number of passes starting again on our left hand side.

One thing worth mentioning from the first half when we were dominating play was that Solanke needed attention after a bad clash of heads. Shortly afterwards he miss timed a header from inside the six yard box which could have been down to this knock.

A draw would have been a fair result but Spurs put away the three good chances they had which was the difference between the two teams.
I noticed that they seemed to be targeting Dango's side a fair bit, but his pace often countered them very well. Can't know how it plays out if he didn't get injured, but they weren't having a lot of joy against him. Amazing how he has so readily applied himself to that role.
 
Our strategy first half was to have Sinistera and Kluivert as a close left hand side pairing with Dango overlapping whenever possible.

This worked well as the Spurs right back seemed to play a more tucked in role close to the right hand side back four man.

This left hand attacking went slightly off track as Aaron's came on for the second half to replace the injured Dango and proceeded to hardly cross the half way line.

The game changer was the unenforced substitution of Sinistera and Kluivert with Billing and Semenyo just after the hour. This just seems to have been a repetition of an hourly substitution routine which we had employed in our recent matches. Until the game was lost our attacks down the left fizzled out and Spurs came more into the game. Out of the blue Lo Celso's through ball found Son in acres of space because three of our back four had moved up to catch him offside but Aarons, out of position at left back, had played him onside. Aarons was then caught wrong footed in the build up to the third.

Surprisingly Brooks came on last change rather than Moore but when Brooks got the ball on the right wing he would cut back inside and play useful diagonal balls over to our left.

Scott's goal was a well worked team goal with a number of passes starting again on our left hand side.

One thing worth mentioning from the first half when we were dominating play was that Solanke needed attention after a bad clash of heads. Shortly afterwards he miss timed a header from inside the six yard box which could have been down to this knock.

A draw would have been a fair result but Spurs put away the three good chances they had which was the difference between the two teams.
This is what MOTD said too.
 
A battling performance but I think we were too slow up front against a well- organised defence. Seemed to want to walk it in at times when a shot would have been a better percentage option.
 
Really impressed with the MOTD2 analysis last night.

Always liked Robinson when we played away at Blackburn (1-0 Grabban) and we were singing ‘We all hate Leeds scum’ at him, and he smiled and shouted ‘What about Hartey?’ (Ian Harte) at us.

We all went ‘ah yes good point’ ;)
Ian Harte was an excellent defender. Not a lot went past him.
 

;