Def_II_Royalz
Star Player
I'm a little confused by your usage of "realism". Are you talking about the arts?It is not pessimism. It is realism and reality. Are you saying that what I have stated today is totally inaccurate?
I'm a little confused by your usage of "realism". Are you talking about the arts?It is not pessimism. It is realism and reality. Are you saying that what I have stated today is totally inaccurate?
I'm a little confused by your usage of "realism". Are you talking about the arts?
Yes it is inaccurate, how many more times FFS?It is not pessimism. It is realism and reality. Are you saying that what I have stated today is totally inaccurate?
No, not me, I have more hair than that.
Many as most players have played pre-season friendlies of some sort of which are competitive to aquire match fitness
Which is it Steven?Playing in that role in a pre-season game is hardly a comparison for playing there in a PL encounter.
You being optimistic for once ?No, not me, I have more hair than that.
Oh I see! So Scott is not really injured as has been reported? Well thank you for the update I was unaware.Yes it is inaccurate, how many more times FFS?
What you have to take into account is that Anthony may well play at right back, but, is he going to be effective in that position? Bearing min mind that he will have to defend out of possession. Playing in that role in a pre-season game is hardly a comparison for playing there in a PL encounter. One may as well play Randolph as right back for all the use Anthony will be. Anthony is a left sided midfielder and so is not up the defensive duties in a cut and thrust PL game. West Ham will have noted this and will press up against him knowing full well that he is not a defender.
If I was the West Ham manager I would be telling my players to attack Bournemouths right side as they have a player playing out of position who cannot defend.
That was a bit of a maverick moveIn our last competitive PL match Everton didn't have a fit right back so they played James Garner there. I guess that's we why we won.
Oh... hang on a minute...
So playing 3rd choice goalkeeper at right back is reality and realism?What you have to take into account is that Anthony may well play at right back, but, is he going to be effective in that position? Bearing min mind that he will have to defend out of possession. Playing in that role in a pre-season game is hardly a comparison for playing there in a PL encounter. One may as well play Randolph as right back for all the use Anthony will be. Anthony is a left sided midfielder and so is not up the defensive duties in a cut and thrust PL game. West Ham will have noted this and will press up against him knowing full well that he is not a defender.
If I was the West Ham manager I would be telling my players to attack Bournemouths right side as they have a player playing out of position who cannot defend.
No, not me, I have more hair than that.
You being optimistic for once ?
R&Rs return to the threads is causing some alarm....but adding some spice.
Projecting the negatives is an essential thing as I see it..you can't just gloss over everything with gung-ho garbage linked to transfers and moronic crap about managers. Expectations are rarely met in the PL....October and November usually signals a Moanfest !
..so I think maybe it's OK if he sticks around a bit longer this time.
Yes Alex Scott is injured, we knew that when we signed him albeit not to the extent it now seems. You my good sir, keep getting him and our other new signing Max Aarons mixed up as you keep telling us that he (Max Aarons) is either injured or now not match fit.Oh I see! So Scott is not really injured as has been reported? Well thank you for the update I was unaware.
Thank you.
Oh I think he's done that already on the Bibby Stockholm thread.Reckon you'll need to up your game Brian unless you want to be seen as yesterday's man round here.
Thank you for your support. I always believe that people confuse negativity with reality and realism. Of course I would love to see us get some form of result tomorrow, but with key players missing it is highly doubtful.R&Rs return to the threads is causing some alarm....but adding some spice.
Projecting the negatives is an essential thing as I see it..you can't just gloss over everything with gung-ho garbage linked to transfers and moronic crap about managers. Expectations are rarely met in the PL....October and November usually signals a Moanfest !
..so I think maybe it's OK if he sticks around a bit longer this time.
There is little need for name calling. Very childish if I may say so.Yes Alex Scott is injured, we knew that when we signed him albeit not to the extent it now seems. You my good sir, keep getting him and our other new signing Max Aarons mixed up as you keep telling us that he (Max Aarons) is either injured or now not match fit.
I bid you good day you knob.
So you admit your mistake then Steven?There is little need for name calling. Very childish if I may say so.
That's ok, as expected. At least it gives us all something to look forward to !AI says it's going to be a couple of months before he's healthy. So may not even see him until October or November.
Iraola: new signing Scott probably out for 'couple of months'
NEW Cherries signing Alex Scott could miss the first months of the Premier League season, according to boss Andoni Iraola.www.bournemouthecho.co.uk