I probably don’t fit into the category of “critics of GON” you can go through this thread and find I was more of a critic of the appointment permanently than GON himself.
However, the issue with GON for me, was the focus was always on the opposition. We would alter how we play, our system depending on the opposition. It was never about us, it was never about our strengths and how we can win football matches. Most teams will tweak tactics and systems to nullify one particular threat the opposition had but still concentrate on what they can do. We didn’t do that.
Due to this we never had an identity under GON, we also never played for a full 90 minutes under him either. We always had spells in games where we were particularly underwhelming. Substitutions often made us worse rather than better.
We also had 9 months of being incapable of defending set-pieces or any kind of cross. This never improved despite almost an entire season. Which also shows GON’s coaching ability in real time.
I think he’s a great coach, always spoke well, the step up to manager in the Premier League, with no real support from backroom staff was wrong. He’s got potential but learning on the job was wrong.
A change for us, was the right move and a change to a manager who gives us an identity and philosophy suits afcb best.
I still back the change and I’d back it all season. Teams in transition take time to build.