Three times in a month you've name checked me while not involved a discussion..it's nice to have a fan.As a fan that has been to Dean Court maybe 10 times in 15 years I find this all quite strange. Stranger than agreeing with Druss on anything actually. Why is this happening? It doesn’t increase the ground capacity. And why in the middle of the season when people have so little time to make a decision? Maybe that is why. I’m all for standing but not at the expense of fans that have already paid, it makes no sense not to wait 4 months
I’m not aware of that, we are so opposite I am surprised that you bother with my Friday ramblingsThree times in a month you've name checked me while not involved a discussion..it's nice to have a fan.
Probably because we were attacking that end 1st half?I grew up watching Bournemouth in the South End. I was behind the goal as junior cherries were chucking monopoly money at Grobbelaar when I was about 10, getting my program signed by Fletcher before he turned into a half decent forward, moving around the stand and standing on the bottom of the floodlights so I could see over people's heads.
The atmosphere is better when standing. I sit in the East Stand now which is lacking in atmosphere, but has a good view of the game.
I am in favour of safe standing if it can generate some more noise from our fans. Against Fulham most of the atmosphere came from the Ted Mac end, North Stand was very quiet in the first half.
Totally agree. I am affected but can Stand for 90 mins unlike some around me. Have scanned stuff on here that is caused by safety concerns about people standing but no one does in block 10 of NS that I am aware of?As a fan that has been to Dean Court maybe 10 times in 15 years I find this all quite strange. Stranger than agreeing with Druss on anything actually. Why is this happening? It doesn’t increase the ground capacity. And why in the middle of the season when people have so little time to make a decision? Maybe that is why. I’m all for standing but not at the expense of fans that have already paid, it makes no sense not to wait 4 months
We attack that end first every game & should sing throughout the whole match, but it seemed silent in the North Stand until we took the lead. Just my observation, others in the ground disagreed with me.Probably because we were attacking that end 1st half?
Begs the question do you put safe standing where therebis the most atmosphere, Ted Mac stand, or the least atmosphere, Main stand.I grew up watching Bournemouth in the South End. I was behind the goal as junior cherries were chucking monopoly money at Grobbelaar when I was about 10, getting my program signed by Fletcher before he turned into a half decent forward, moving around the stand and standing on the bottom of the floodlights so I could see over people's heads.
The atmosphere is better when standing. I sit in the East Stand now which is lacking in atmosphere, but has a good view of the game.
I am in favour of safe standing if it can generate some more noise from our fans. Against Fulham most of the atmosphere came from the Ted Mac end, North Stand was very quiet in the first half.
In balance it is the so called ‘older’ fans who have the money to spend in the club shop and to travel to away games…let’s not alienate the grey generation shall we?…also the young fans will be off like a shot if we dropped down the leagues?I think Bill was right when he mentioned the demographic of fans.
80 per cent of this thread is people discussing if they can or can't stand for 90 minutes.
No disrespect to any of the older fans, we all age at the same rate, so nobody has got there quicker or slower than the next man.
It does raise a salient point however about how to grow the business, one Foley has every right to ask, as after all it is his money getting spent.
Younger fans are the future of the club. It makes sense to accommodate them.
So as long as your not affected you couldn’t care less?Begs the question do you put safe standing where therebis the most atmosphere, Ted Mac stand, or the least atmosphere, Main stand.
I'm happy with either answer.
I have to ask Rob as you seem fully in support of this and like every post where someone is supporting this change....We’re all in it together lol
If you read my first post elsewhere you’ll see I’m in favour of safe standing but not the way this is being implemented.I have to ask Rob as you seem fully in support of this and like every post where someone is supporting this change....
How can you have your YouTube channel reviewing accessibility to grounds you visit and be a champion of disability rights and access, but be supporting the moving of those with disabilities who have paid for their seat? Could you imagine being told for the rest of the season they were moving you from your spot to in front of row A in the corner of main stand because they want to add some plush hospitality seats to the platform?
No one is arguing against safe standing but all its doing right now is eviting those less able to stand for a variety of reasons. This isn't a choice based discussion.
And on the point of accessibility, the Disabled Supporters Association are broadly supportive of the mood, and I know they will also represent the views of disabled people affected.
Nice twist. I’m not surprised you’re now taking this line.This is the worst part.. the DSA support the forced movement of those with disabilities? Seems very strange.
Completely unrepresentative just for fun survey.
Ignore SGSA involvement. The club could have avoided that.
If you read my first post elsewhere you’ll see I’m in favour of safe standing but not the way this is being implemented.
Nice twist? What's the twist and what's the line? If it's not a forced movement of people with disabilities what is it?Nice twist. I’m not surprised you’re now taking this line.