Vlad_The_Impaler
First Team
Nearly 2k soft headed drones spent 2 hours prior to kick off plus the 90 mins football think breathing in Carbon Dioxide for 3.30 hours is healthy because some phuckwit in a hi-vis jacket told you to do it.
Agreed.You don't add the odds,if both teams were even and you put a pound on a double,you would get four pound back so that would be three to one.Ten pound double on two ten to one teams would give you eleven hundred pounds back,one hundred and ten pound going on to a ten to one shot.Your way of thinking two ten two one shots is twenty to one but it's not
I think the bet might have been for both teams to reach the final.....12-1 sounds about right.Agreed.
But I doubt we were 3-1 and Swansea 4-1
There's no way he would have got 12-1.
That was my point.
I think you could of got two to one on us and three to one on Swansea,so a pound double stake would give you twelve pound back,so that's eleven to one.A pound on us to win gives you three pound going on to a three to one gives you twelve pound,minus the stake gives you eleven to oneAgreed.
But I doubt we were 3-1 and Swansea 4-1
There's no way he would have got 12-1.
That was my point.
Completely agree. We were essentially holding on to a one goal lead with over ninety minutes still to play. It was a ridiculous thing to do. The way we approached the second half after going one up made no sense. We were in the ascendancy and then just sat back and held on to what we had. You could see the mind set of the players completely changed. It’s like they didn’t understand it is a two legged tie.
I think you could of got two to one on us and three to one on Swansea,so a pound double stake would give you twelve pound back,so that's eleven to one.A pound on us to win gives you three pound going on to a three to one gives you twelve pound,minus the stake gives you eleven to one
Agreed.
But I doubt we were 3-1 and Swansea 4-1
There's no way he would have got 12-1.
That was my point.
Completely agree. We were essentially holding on to a one goal lead with over ninety minutes still to play. It was a ridiculous thing to do. The way we approached the second half after going one up made no sense. We were in the ascendancy and then just sat back and held on to what we had. You could see the mind set of the players completely changed. It’s like they didn’t understand it is a two legged tie.
I’m pretty sure away goals don’t count at allaway goals count if (likely) it goes to extra time in the second leg
they had made five subs and had fresh legs
we were a bit knackered but a goal up
our bench is shite despite the continued "best squad in the division" garbage
and just imagine your melt-down if we'd have conceded in the last 5 minutes
I’m pretty sure away goals don’t count at all
Fck me our fans are sitting down!.....COME ON BOYS!!!!!
Should probably check your facts before spouting nonsense while trying to belittle someone. Better luck next timeaway goals count if (likely) it goes to extra time in the second leg
they had made five subs and had fresh legs
we were a bit knackered but a goal up
our bench is shite despite the continued "best squad in the division" garbage
and just imagine your melt-down if we'd have conceded in the last 5 minutes
Not much point us going there and trying to score any then. Not going to be much fun to watch us hanging on to a one goal lead for 90 mins.I’m pretty sure away goals don’t count at all
I heard Alan Hansen once say on TV “Anything - Nil is a good result" after the first home leg of a two leg tie...and he should know...
Alan Hansen was no doubt talking about European football where away goals count for more than home goals. If that was true then there would have been a point in hanging on to a one goal lead but it wasn't the case.