Said the very same.Vina - wobbly at the back yesterday but stunning going forward. Could we use this guy left midfield? He’s got pace, a good range of passes and can shoot from distance (something we’ve long lacked among the midfielders). Just a thought …
I've jsut googled around and found this analysis on Vina, by Roma, after they signed him. They then do what seems like a pretty thorough analysis/comparison in different areas of the game. Vina comes out on top of most defensive ratings compared to Spinazzola.
All things considered, perhaps theres some kind of adaption going on to the English game, when it comes to the defensive side perhaps??
As the Americans would say 'don't take my word for it...' - see link below:
Its also highlighted how Vina scores higher in 'Dribbles':
https://www.chiesaditotti.com/2021/8/13/22587654/matias-vina-roma-tactics-analysis-spinazzola
And just for a laugh, heres his ratings in the monstrous instituion of stats, that is Football Manager:
Defensive stats are pretty solid as far as top flight fullbacks/wingbacks go.
View attachment 10611
I was thinking on Saturday, if we do sign him permanently we absolutely must not coach out his attacking tendencies. I think he needs to be allowed to make these forays forwards, others just need to cover the space he leaves behind. Because let's be honest, if we sign him purely as a defender, there are probably far better, cheaper options available ! But he's an exciting player with real quality going forwards. If we can afford that luxury then I'd love him to sign permanently.Think Vina is the sort of left/wing back who gives you optimism when he ventures forward.
I was thinking on Saturday, if we do sign him permanently we absolutely must not coach out his attacking tendencies. I think he needs to be allowed to make these forays forwards, others just need to cover the space he leaves behind. Because let's be honest, if we sign him purely as a defender, there are probably far better, cheaper options available ! But he's an exciting player with real quality going forwards. If we can afford that luxury then I'd love him to sign permanently.
Who on here is saying they don't want us to sign him?So let me get this ŕight.
People on here wanted to throw money at Zemura who couldn't defend for toffee,didn't score any goals this season or get any assists,but we don't want to sign someone who is a better defender,should have 3 goals in 3 starts if not for VAR,and will obviously get assists too.
Charlie Daniels wasn't an amazing defender either btw.
Switching to that as our primary system could work, but would need some work recruitment wise, as we'd need more specialist wing backs than just Vina and Tavernier.I think he's ideal for the wing-back role within a back three system, with Kelly supporting over at LCB. From what I've seen, Gary actually seems to play this system quite well compared to other managers we've seen try.
I also think Vina will improve defensively as he gets more accustomed to the PL. Sign him up I say!
It was widely reported, when we signed him, that there was an option for 13 million if I remember correctly.According to the Echo’s version of what Richard Hughes said on Solent, we have an option to buy Vina, in contrast to Jack Stephens where it would depend if our Championship friends up the road wanted to sell: “Unlike Matias (Vina), there is no option (to buy) for us, so Southampton are the masters of what will happen there.”
I would like to see us exercise the option to buy Vina.