northstandmark
UTC Legend
Honest answer is I don't know, and I do know football is cynical enough to dope. And we can likely be sure players weren't always clean in the past. That said I take comfort in 2 things:I was thinking about doping in football recently. How many of you think it's actually really common but that football is too big to fall so it's hardly ever policed?
1) Being such a multi-discipline sport, it wouldn't be nearly as beneficial to footballers as say sprinters or other specific athletes. Anabolics and testosterone etc may help you be that bit stronger or faster for longer. But they don't turn a lower league player's technique, first touch, eye for goal. timing of a tackle, range of passing etc into a PL footballer's level of those same attributes.
2) Football is a bit of a village. So much news leaks out constantly, with it being under such a microscope (unlike athletics or cycling, which the mainstream media forgets about for months or years on end in-between major events).
You know about transfers well before they're official, you get leaked salaries and fees everywhere, you hear clubs are in financial trouble well before they admit it. There's such a churn of players and staff between clubs. Players and staff who later become journalists and pundits. Football is perhaps the most leaky sport on the planet.
I doubt a club would be able to keep something like that a secret, when they can't even keep the clauses written into their player's contracts a secret. And if every club was in on it, a journalist would likely be jumping to leak it.
Last edited: