cockbeard
Fans' Favourite
Looking on their forum they don't seem to rate Ward-Prowse - he is described on one thread as "Championship at best".
They'll be needing plenty of them come August
Looking on their forum they don't seem to rate Ward-Prowse - he is described on one thread as "Championship at best".
ThisYes, their communication is shite and they've been treating us like mugs for years. They don't appear to care about that though.
Its not 'depressive', don't be silly. You say you want a new stadium but you cant put forward a single benefit of doing so. You are the one mired in misery ;-)I am.
I’m just fed up with the doom and gloom on here. DJ talking about the facilities not being updated in a story about Ake going to Man U or Spurs being the newest most bizarre biased take on what is normally a decently impartial front page.
If Man U or Spurs come in for Ake with the right money he will go. This would equally apply if we had the worlds best training facility and a 24000 stadium. To suggest otherwise is an insult to our intelligence. If training facilities and stadium size were important to players Cook, Brooks and Lerma would still be at Leeds, Sheff Utd and Levante respectively and Ake would never have been here. It’s nonsense and depressive.
Also, to keep suggesting the training ground impedes player development is hilarious when there is no evidence to suggest this and huge evidence to the contrary in 90% of the squad.
Pointing that out doesn’t mean I don’t want one!
Why didn't they release the statement as soon as the transfer window closed,that's what I can't understandMy point is that you are banging on about returns / returns / returns as the reason its isnt happening.
Do you not think for a minute he sat down and worked all of that out in the years it took to locate the site for a stadium.
That’s a shame but it doesn’t really matterThis
I think the low baller may have been the ridiculous sudden rise in transfer fees . He was seemingly happy to buy land and get planning permission, no doubt he must have had an idea of cost and the returns, the same with the stadium but then bang £25 million on Lerma the price just went up and up and the realisation the new TV rights have blown transfer fees out of all proportion.
I think that's where the money is in the PL these days. What you receive in TV money you have to spend to compete. BUT if you manage to get a player at a good price ( possibly from the Championship ) and Eddie helps him to become great, you do have a chance to make a very decent profit on that player these days. All the more reason to employ a manager who doesn't insist on buying ready made players for top dollar. I think this is a good business model for Max and Eddie and of course it might take a couple of years before it bears fruit. With this transfer fee madness the nature of the business has changed significantly. You won't see a profit from the TV money since even bang average players are damn expensive these days but you do have a chance to make a decent profit with the players you buy, develop and sell.One possible bonus of transfer inflation is that we may well have already have a player on the books who’s sale could pay for a stadium in one shot. I have a suspicion Max and co are banking on that as a strategy (as much as it amounts to one)
....we have potentially Ake at around 40 million...Brooks at around 20 million....Fraser at around 15 million...aswell as Lerma, Rico, Begovic,King,Wilson, and Smith who could all fetch decent millions?
ironically...maybe the best time to 'invest' in a new ground is when we go down and have to sell our best players!!!
In all seriousness though we will do well sitting in the top six and keeping hold of the likes of Ake and Brooks IMO...
I think that's where the money is in the PL these days. What you receive in TV money you have to spend to compete. BUT if you manage to get a player at a good price ( possibly from the Championship ) and Eddie helps him to become great, you do have a chance to make a very decent profit on that player these days. All the more reason to employ a manager who doesn't insist on buying ready made players for top dollar. I think this is a good business model for Max and Eddie and of course it might take a couple of years before it bears fruit. With this transfer fee madness the nature of the business has changed significantly. You won't see a profit from the TV money since even bang average players are damn expensive these days but you do have a chance to make a decent profit with the players you buy, develop and sell.
Its not 'depressive', don't be silly. You say you want a new stadium but you cant put forward a single benefit of doing so. You are the one mired in misery ;-)
And before you ask, I did offer some positive reasons to SDD yesterday.
I agree with wallmth. Apparently Eddies been misguided on tactics and player selections according to you over the years, but when it comes to the stadium he's spot on! One is his job, the other isn't.
Anyway, as before, I'd take an expanded Ted Shed as a progressive sign.
My point is that you are banging on about returns / returns / returns as the reason its isnt happening.
Do you not think for a minute he sat down and worked all of that out in the years it took to locate the site for a stadium.
I think he did which was why he brought in Peak 6. I don’t stay that close to non footballing matters but when they came on board wasn’t the reason given that they would be necessary for the stadium building project?
The only person I recall who suggested they were on board for the ground was Al. He even posted a pic of a stadium in Hungary and said Peak6 were all over it like a rash .
UEL suggested Peak6 paid for Wisheres loan and Defoe.
They own 25% of the club, perhaps they wont cough up 25% of the stadium / academy construction.
And I’ll counter with Ake, L.Cook and Brooks. These are the new type of signings we have made with potential for very good returns ! I believe our buying policy has been adjusted since we realised that buying players just to do a job was not particularly viable for the bottom line. Since we don’t have an academy to speak of, buying and developing slightly under the radar players is our chance to bring in the profits we need to drive the club forwards. Let’s just wait and see but I believe off-field developments can be financed without Max signing too many cheques if we are shrewd in this crazy new transfer market,"What you receive in TV money you have to spend to compete"
2015-16 - lowest wage bill in the league
2016-17 - 3rd lowest wage bill in the league
"you do have a chance to make a very decent profit on that player these days"
We made about
£10M on Ritchie
£5M on Afobe,
We've lost
£8M on Gradel
£2M on Murray
£2M on Rantie
£2M on Grabban
£1M on Iturbe
and I doubt we'll see any profit from Ibe, B. Smith.
While we I don't expect profit from Lerma, Rico or Begovic they are at least getting game time.
I don't think the transfer market is a magic money tree.
Just that we currently don't produce players who we sell on for a profit. We usually just let them go and ply their trade in the lower leagues. It's unlikely that our development squad will be much of an income stream in the foreseeable future, that's all I'm getting at. As opposed to Southampton, who for a good few years made good money blooding academy players in the PL and then selling them on for big bucks. I think that was quite good business for them for a while although that seems to have dried up a bit in the last year or two.I thought the 'development squad 'was an Academy as such..what's so different?