SlowDownDerek
UTC Legend
That argument doesn't make sense to me. If someone chooses to be a vegetarian, does that mean that no-one else is allowed to eat meat?
I don't really get your point.
If these people owning Newcastle is wrong then they should not have been allowed to take them over - this is what I think should have happened.
What has happened is that they have been allowed to take them over and it's seemingly down to some football manager to decide the rights and wrongs of things and publicly justify them.
Either it's right or wrong to allow these people to run Newcastle. If it's right then each potent employee makes their personal moral decision and that's the end of it. If it's wrong then they should be prevented from running Newcastle.