27 days???
Plus no trains Xmas and Boxing Day?
What a shi*thouse company.
Up there with the Royal Mail, doing their best that ex pats don't get their general election postal votes again.
I blame the unions.
27 days???
Plus no trains Xmas and Boxing Day?
What a shi*thouse company.
Up there with the Royal Mail, doing their best that ex pats don't get their general election postal votes again.
Think it’s more complex than that.
I blame Thatcher.I blame the unions.
27 days???
Plus no trains Xmas and Boxing Day?
What a shi*thouse company.
Up there with the Royal Mail, doing their best that ex pats don't get their general election postal votes again.
Someone commented on one of the news stories that it's supposed to be a public service, not a political football to be kicked around. I agree.
They should run the trains without them and when everything runs fine (see: just as **** as it usually is) we can fire them for being such arrogant, inconsiderate twerps.
Do you work for SWT and are you a union member?Spoken like a true capitalist, until it affects you.
Unfortunately, knowing as little as you do, it's illegal as it stands to run a train without a guard.
Ask victims of the Clapham, Ladbroke Grove or Southall disasters or people who have been attacked on trains or involved with fires onboard trains if they want guards on board. The media won't let you know it, shhh, but the majority of the public back the striking guards just as they did on the southern rail dispute. But hey, it doesn't make good right wing news.
What, the public back essentially an entire month of strikes?Spoken like a true capitalist, until it affects you.
Unfortunately, knowing as little as you do, it's illegal as it stands to run a train without a guard.
Ask victims of the Clapham, Ladbroke Grove or Southall disasters or people who have been attacked on trains or involved with fires onboard trains if they want guards on board. The media won't let you know it, shhh, but the majority of the public back the striking guards just as they did on the southern rail dispute. But hey, it doesn't make good right wing news.
I take it you’re been sarcastic.
What, the public back essentially an entire month of strikes?
And what percentage of that public are regular users who attempt to travel regularly on the already pitiful service?
And what about the literally tens of thousands of Southwestern services that have run since 2017 without a guard?
Do you work for SWT and are you a union member?
What, the public back essentially an entire month of strikes?
And what percentage of that public are regular users who attempt to travel regularly on the already pitiful service?
And what about the literally tens of thousands of Southwestern services that have run since 2017 without a guard?
I think (happy to be corrected) that thameslink trains don’t have a guard either
You are Tobias Ellwood and I claim my £5!Someone commented on one of the news stories that it's supposed to be a public service, not a political football to be kicked around. I agree.
They should run the trains without them and when everything runs fine (see: just as **** as it usually is) we can fire them for being such arrogant, inconsiderate twerps.
Nick,And have cheap budgets and unrealistic tariffs driving freight back on the roads ?
No ta .