SlowDownDerek
UTC Legend
Why? The article says an average of 9.7%
Yes but you've apparently got to pay £14 on top of the quoted prices for the two women's games.
Why? The article says an average of 9.7%
Why? The article says an average of 9.7%
Yes but you've apparently got to pay £14 on top of the quoted prices for the two women's games.
I was just quoting the article! Sorry
Anyone want to buy 2 tickets for the womens games. I certainly won't be using them. What a shambolic statement. Who dreamt that crock of **************** up?
Or maybe change it to 1 out of 3 ain't good.I'm trying hard to see this in a positive light.
Good news - I can renew my ST
Bad news - I am forced to pay £14 additional fee to have the choice to watch the ladies play two games
Good news - I am not being forced to attend, just forced to pay £14 for the pleasure of not having to go
There. As Meatloaf used to warble, Two outa Three ain't bad.
Hopefully can be credited if cannot attend. I have nothing against the ladies team and have attended a game, but object to being forced to pay for it.
Does sting a littlw that each place in the table is worth approximately £2m knowing the state of our last few performances.
This price increase will bring in approximately £300,000. I dread to think what drop in the ocean that is in terms of our yearly playing staff wage bill.
It stinks of “others have done it so we are”. This was the opportunity for some free PR to just keep it the same and it’s an own goal IMO.
And people wonder why I don’t rate our board…
A very simple thing completely messed up and what could have been a positive message turned into a negative one.
Most brilliant CEO’s in the country are on less than a quarter of what we pay ours and have the grounding through excellent business organisations.