ErikthViking
UTC Legend
Seems he’s made his debut tonight, don’t think it’s a league game though
First team, league match. Subbed after 84 minutes.
Seems he’s made his debut tonight, don’t think it’s a league game though
I'm no Tindallphobe but I'd love to see a transcript of the meeting at the start of last season when it was decided that Zemura, Anthony and Kilkenny weren't up to it so we'd get in Long, Riquelme and Wilshere
Not really that odd seeing as most on here would have loaned Kilkenny...Travers..Anthony and Zemura out to League 1 this season.Very odd decisions, especially Long.
Very odd decisions, especially Long.
He may not have hit the heights we'd hoped for us on the field, but always seemed a good guy off it, clear he really cares for his family. Good luck to him.
He may not have hit the heights we'd hoped for us on the field, but always seemed a good guy off it, clear he really cares for his family. Good luck to him.
Probably a player Parker would have liked..... maybe we wouldn't have seen Zemura had Rico stayed.
Very average left back for but an absolutely superb left sided CB for us in a 3.
Probably a player Parker would have liked..... maybe we wouldn't have seen Zemura had Rico stayed.
Very average left back for but an absolutely superb left sided CB for us in a 3.
You don't need me to tell you we have a conservative manager tbf......most neutral Championship fans would tell you the same thing.... it's just a fact rather than any agenda.Next Topfarrier will turn up on the Meatloaf thread with "of course if Scott Parker had been involved in producing Bat out of Hell it would have been too conservative and Fulham fans would have hated it".
So was Danjuma....not sure what your point is tbh.Rico was still here when Parker took over.
Hard to know but if Parker had the choice at the start of the season between Rico or an unproven Zemura I think he'd have gone with Rico.... would have been perfectly understandable given the lack of experience in the rest of the side for that first game tbf .Maybe. Not sure. Parker clearly likes attacking full backs, which I don't think is what Rico is necessarily.
You don't need me to tell you we have a conservative manager tbf......most neutral Championship fans would tell you the same thing.... it's just a fact rather than any agenda.
You brought it up in this thread tbf.....I tend to stay on topic.When it comes up in every unrelated thread it is quite clearly an agenda. Nothing wrong with an agenda tbf but relating every topic to the same point over and over again is beyond boring.
You brought it up in this thread tbf.....I tend to stay on topic.
I didn't have a pop at Parker.....I said that Rico might've been a player Parker would have liked and he could well have started the season ahead of Zemura given the lack of experience in the side at that time......not everyone has an agenda Derek .I saw a thread about Rico and saw an opportunity to have another pop at Parker?
Hard to know but if Parker had the choice at the start of the season between Rico or an unproven Zemura I think he'd have gone with Rico.... would have been perfectly understandable given the lack of experience in the rest of the side for that first game tbf .